blob: cdf3c6a2f64781c735feed10e8d0604fbb94800e [file] [log] [blame]
CASSANDRA-14092: MAXIMUM TTL EXPIRATION DATE
---------------------------------------------
The maximum expiration timestamp that can be represented by the storage engine has been raised to
2106-02-07T06:28:13+00:00 from the previous 2038-01-19T03:14:06+00:00, which means that INSERTS using
TTL that would expire after this date are not currently supported. Notice that on previous versions <5.0
or when 5.0 is ran in compatibility mode (<="oa" sstable formats) the limit stays at at 2038-01-19T03:14:06+00:00.
There is a new yaml property storage_compatibility_mode that determines the
Cassandra major version we want to stay compatible with. Its default is CASSANDRA_4, which means that
the node sstables, commitlog, hints and messaging version will stay compatible with Cassandra 4.x,
2038 will still be the limit, and it will be possible to rollback to the previous version. To upgrade:
- Do a rolling upgrade to 5.0 where 2038 will still be the limit. At this point, the node won't write
anything incompatible with Cassandra 4.x, and you would still be able to rollback to that version.
- Do a rolling restart setting storage_compatibility_mode=UPGRADING. Once all nodes
are in storage version 5, 2106 will become the new limit.
- Do a rolling restart setting storage_compatibility_mode=NONE. Now mixed
2038 and 2106 nodes are no longer possible.
Notice the yaml property needs to be set all the time for all executables and tools. It
will be removed in future versions when 2038 nodes are no longer possible.
# Expiration Date Overflow Policy
We plan to lift this limitation in newer versions, but while the fix is not available,
operators can decide which policy to apply when dealing with inserts with TTL exceeding
the maximum supported expiration date:
- REJECT: this is the default policy and will reject any requests with expiration
date timestamp after 2106-02-07T06:28:13+00:00 or 2038-01-19T03:14:06+00:00.
- CAP: any insert with TTL expiring after 2106-02-07T06:28:13+00:00 will expire on
2106-02-07T06:28:13+00:00 or 2038-01-19T03:14:06+00:00 and the client will receive a warning.
- CAP_NOWARN: same as previous, except that the client warning will not be emitted.
These policies may be specified via the -Dcassandra.expiration_date_overflow_policy=POLICY
startup option in the jvm.options configuration file.
# Potential data loss on earlier versions
Prior to 3.0.16 (3.0.X) and 3.11.2 (3.11.x), there was no protection against
INSERTS with TTL expiring after the maximum supported date, causing the expiration
time field to overflow and the records to expire immediately. Expired records due
to overflow will not be queryable and will be permanently removed after a compaction.
2.1.X, 2.2.X and earlier series are not subject to this bug when assertions are enabled
since an AssertionError is thrown during INSERT when the expiration time field overflows
on these versions. When assertions are disabled then it is possible to INSERT entries
with overflowed local expiration time and even the earlier versions are subject to data
loss due to this bug.
On versions < 5.0 the overflow limit was at 2038-01-19T03:14:06+00:00 so this issue
only affected INSERTs with very large TTLs, close to the maximum allowed value
of 630720000 seconds (20 years), starting from 2018-01-19T03:14:06+00:00. As time progresses,
the maximum supported TTL will be gradually reduced as the maximum expiration date approaches.
For instance, a user on an affected version on 2028-01-19T03:14:06 with a TTL of 10 years
will be affected by this bug, so we urge users of very large TTLs to upgrade to a version
where this issue is addressed as soon as possible.
On versions >= 5.0 this limit has been raised to 2106-02-07T06:28:13+00:00.
# Data Recovery
SSTables from Cassandra versions prior to 2.1.20/2.2.12/3.0.16/3.11.2 containing entries
with overflowed expiration time that were backed up or did not go through compaction can
be recovered by reinserting overflowed entries with a valid expiration time and a higher
timestamp, since tombstones may have been generated with the original timestamp.
To find out if an SSTable has an entry with overflowed expiration, inspect it with the
'sstablemetadata' tool and look for a negative "Minimum local deletion time" field. SSTables
in this condition should be backed up immediately, as they are subject to data loss during
compaction.
A "--reinsert-overflowed-ttl" option was added to scrub to rewrite SSTables containing
rows with overflowed expiration time with the maximum expiration date of
2038-01-19T03:14:06+00:00 and the original timestamp + 1 (ms). Two methods are offered
for recovery of SSTables via scrub:
- Offline scrub:
- Clone the data directory tree to another location, keeping only the folders and the
contents of the system tables.
- Clone the configuration directory to another location, setting the data_file_directories
property to the cloned data directory in the cloned cassandra.yaml.
- Copy the affected SSTables to the cloned data location of the affected table.
- Set the environment variable CASSANDRA_CONF=<cloned configuration directory>.
- Execute "sstablescrub --reinsert-overflowed-ttl <keyspace> <table>".
WARNING: not specifying --reinsert-overflowed-ttl is equivalent to a single-sstable
compaction, so the data with overflowed will be removed - make sure to back up
your SSTables before running scrub.
- Once the scrub is completed, copy the resulting SSTables to the original data directory.
- Execute "nodetool refresh" in a live node to load the recovered SSTables.
- Online scrub:
- Disable compaction on the node with "nodetool disableautocompaction" - this step is crucial
as otherwise, the data may be removed permanently during compaction.
- Copy the SSTables containing entries with overflowed expiration time to the data directory.
- run "nodetool refresh" to load the SSTables.
- run "nodetool scrub --reinsert-overflowed-ttl <keyspace> <table>".
- Re-enable compactions after verifying that scrub recovered the missing entries.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14092 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14227 for more details about this issue.