| <?xml version='1.0' encoding='US-ASCII'?> |
| <!-- $Id$ --> |
| <!DOCTYPE issues SYSTEM 'issues.dtd' [ |
| <!ENTITY people SYSTEM 'people.ent'> |
| ]> |
| <issues date='$Date$'> |
| |
| <!-- People --> |
| &people; |
| |
| <!-- Issues --> |
| <issue id='I1' originator='andyc'> |
| <title>Entity Management & Readers</title> |
| <detail> |
| The heart of parsing XML documents is the interaction between |
| the various scanners and the document input stream. Since this |
| is the critical path in the parser, performance is an important |
| consideration. Yet, at the same time, the interaction between |
| scanner and reader should be simple and straightforward. |
| </detail> |
| <problem> |
| <detail> |
| Entity stack management. The scanners can push readers on the |
| stack when an entity reference is seen but who pops the reader? |
| </detail> |
| </problem> |
| <problem> |
| <detail> |
| Who scans the XMLDecl and TextDecl lines? The scanner(s) or |
| the entity reader? |
| </detail> |
| </problem> |
| <problem> |
| <detail> |
| Handling the changing of the input stream reader based |
| on the encoding specified in the XMLDecl or TextDecl lines. |
| </detail> |
| </problem> |
| <problem> |
| <detail> |
| How do we handle the pushback buffer needed at certain |
| times during parsing while still keeping the amount of |
| delegation down to a minimum? |
| </detail> |
| </problem> |
| </issue> |
| |
| <issue id='I2' originator='estaub'> |
| <title>Parser Pipeline Construction</title> |
| <detail> |
| The parser is designed as a pipeline and the components need |
| to be connected together and configured. |
| </detail> |
| <problem> |
| <detail> |
| Is there a generic way to put components together in |
| order to construct the pipeline? If users want to |
| construct a new parser object with a different pipeline |
| configuration, this should be easy to do. |
| </detail> |
| </problem> |
| </issue> |
| |
| <issue id='I3' originator='estaub'> |
| <title>Operations on XML Infoset</title> |
| <detail> |
| There are many emerging XML standards that involve operations |
| on the <a href='http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset'>XML Infoset</a>. |
| <a href='http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude'>XInclude</a> is one of |
| these standards that defines how XML inclusion operates on the |
| Infoset. |
| </detail> |
| <problem> |
| <detail> |
| When should these operations take place in the parser |
| pipeline: before or after validation? And if it's after |
| validation, then what does it mean for the parser to say a |
| document is "valid"? The inclusion could cause the document to |
| become invalid. This is more than an implementation issue; it's |
| a standards issue. |
| </detail> |
| <comment author='estaub' link='http://archive.covalent.net/xml/xerces-j-dev/2000/09/0482.xml'> |
| If XInclude processing were called after validation, then what would be |
| validated would be the unexpanded XInclude. In other words, the schema or |
| DTD would describe the original unexpanded xinclude:href attributes, and so |
| forth. |
| </comment> |
| </problem> |
| <problem> |
| <detail> |
| Should operations on the XML Infoset even be in the parser |
| pipeline? |
| </detail> |
| </problem> |
| </issue> |
| |
| </issues> |