| <?xml version="1.0"?> |
| |
| <document title="Introduction"> |
| <description> |
| The WebApp Module for the Apache Web Server |
| </description> |
| |
| <section title="Description"> |
| <description> |
| What is the WebApp Module |
| </description> |
| |
| <p> |
| Do you remember the old times of <b>mod_jserv</b>? Maybe you're too |
| young, but I do pretty well. At that time, the amazing <b>Apache |
| JServ</b> servlet container didn't have an HTTP stack per se, but |
| rather relied on the Apache 1.2 and 1.3 web server to have clients |
| accessing it. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| And this is when a "module" came into the picture: a module such |
| as <b>mod_jserv</b> or the <b>WebApp</b> module connects the HTTP |
| stack of the front end web-server(s) with one or more instances of |
| a servlet container in the back end. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| The WebApp module does exactly that, it's not finished (it might |
| never will), but it works, and it works pretty damn good. Plus (this |
| comes for free), we tried very hard to keep the internals clean and |
| well-designed, so that it will be so easy for anyone to simply provide |
| patches in case of bugs (yes, there are some!). |
| </p> |
| |
| </section> |
| |
| <section title="Purpose"> |
| <description> |
| Why should I use the WebApp Module? |
| </description> |
| |
| <p> |
| Because we say so? Not kidding, but it's really up to you, there are |
| several alternatives to "do the job", when we started this project |
| all of them were (in our not-so-humble-opinion), a pile of crap. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| Lately there have been some improvements on those alternatives, and |
| probably, if you're wondering why you want to try out WebApp, you should |
| really stop reading now, and go and download something else. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| If instead you're an adventurous geek who's up for a challenge, skip |
| the rest of this document and go to the <a href="building.xml"/> |
| section, there's where the fun starts. |
| </p> |
| |
| </section> |
| |
| |
| <section title="Alternatives"> |
| <description> |
| Are there alternative ways to connect Apache and Tomcat? |
| </description> |
| |
| <p> |
| It would NOT be fair not to talk about our lovely (???) competitors, |
| of course, otherwise someone might even start calling us names, so, |
| in brief, you can use the following alternatives: |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| <b>Tomcat's internal HTTP stack and mod_proxy</b>, which is not that |
| bad, but slow, well, of course Tomcat didn't have 8/9 years of C |
| routine optimization like the Apache Web Server, but it's quite good. |
| The only disadvantage I see is that it looks pretty ridiculous to |
| parse an HTTP request to generate it again (exactly the same), and |
| to parse again the response to send it back unchanged... Anyway. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| <b>mod_jk</b>, is the same of the WebApp module, if you're wondering |
| why you should be using the latter instead of the former, well, I |
| believe I already answered this question (forget about WebApp). |
| </p> |
| |
| </section> |
| |
| </document> |