| //// |
| Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more |
| contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with |
| this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. |
| The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 |
| (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with |
| the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at |
| |
| http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| |
| Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software |
| distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, |
| WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. |
| See the License for the specific language governing permissions and |
| limitations under the License. |
| //// |
| Meetings |
| ======== |
| |
| October 29, 2015 |
| ---------------- |
| |
| The meeting was scheduled for 1:00pm EST, started on time and was held via Google Hangout hosted by Stephen Mallette. |
| Meeting adjourned at 1:45pm EST. |
| |
| *Committers/PPMC Members* |
| |
| * Stephen Mallette |
| * Marko Rodriguez |
| * Daniel Kuppitz |
| |
| *Guests* |
| |
| _None_ |
| |
| *Minutes* |
| |
| * Reviewed the scope of 3.1.0-incubating in JIRA in the context of the upcoming release date on November 16, 2015. |
| * It was noted that with the new one week code freeze policy that the real cut-off date for work is November 9, 2015. |
| * There was general consensus on the call that work should be accomplished in such a way that the code review process |
| not drag into the code freeze time period. In other words, pull requests to the release branch should be completed |
| well ahead of the 9th. |
| |
| Upon review of the tickets in JIRA assigned to 3.1.0-incubating, the following were removed from the 3.1.0-incubating |
| roadmap: |
| |
| [width="100%",cols="2,5,5",options="header"] |
| |========================================================= |
| |ID |Description |Removal Reasoning |
| |TINKERPOP3-891 |Re-examine Sandboxing Abstractions |Low priority and time limitations. |
| |TINKERPOP3-890 |Remove the concept of branch/ package. |Awaiting step library definition in 3.2.0-incubating. |
| |TINKERPOP3-873 |FoldStep should default to using BulkSet for efficiency. |Awaiting step library definition in 3.2.0-incubating. |
| |TINKERPOP3-864 |Operator.mean would be nice. |Awaiting step library definition in 3.2.0-incubating. |
| |TINKERPOP3-862 |Add a TraversalSourceStrategy that provides "locked" values. |Low priority and time limitations. |
| |TINKERPOP3-854 |Remove PropertyMapStep in favor of multi-instruction construction. |Non-trivial given time limitations. |
| |TINKERPOP3-789 |Choose then Enforce Semantics for Graph.close() |Non-trivial given time limitations. |
| |TINKERPOP3-768 |MatchStep in OLAP should be smart about current vertex. |Non-trivial given time limitations. |
| |TINKERPOP3-705 |Make use of a MemoryRDD instead of Accumulators in SparkGraphComputer? |Non-trivial given time limitations. |
| |TINKERPOP3-659 |GraphConfiguration Class |Non-trivial given time limitations. |
| |TINKERPOP3-623 |More output for OLAP jobs |Not clearly defined given time limitations. |
| |TINKERPOP3-620 |Commutative Step Marker interface |Awaiting step library definition in 3.2.0-incubating |
| |TINKERPOP3-550 |Gremlin IO needs to support both OLTP and OLAP naturally. |Not clearly defined given time limitations. |
| |TINKERPOP3-479 |Consider Providing "getOrCreate" Functionality |Not clearly defined given time limitations. |
| |========================================================= |