| <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" | |
| "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> | |
| <html> | |
| <head> | |
| <style type="text/css"> /* <![CDATA[ */ | |
| @import "tigris-branding/css/tigris.css"; | |
| @import "tigris-branding/css/inst.css"; | |
| /* ]]> */</style> | |
| <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="print" | |
| href="tigris-branding/css/print.css"/> | |
| <script type="text/javascript" src="tigris-branding/scripts/tigris.js"></script> | |
| <title>Subversion Testimonials</title> | |
| <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" | |
| content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/> | |
| </head> | |
| <body> | |
| <div class="app"> | |
| <h1 style="text-align: center;">Subversion Testimonials</h1> | |
| <p>If you're trying to persuade your organization to try Subversion, | |
| the <a href="#testimonials">testimonials</a> and the <a | |
| href="#open-source-projects-using-svn">list of open source projects | |
| using Subversion</a> below might help.</p> | |
| <p>See also our <a href="project_links.html">links page</a> and our <a | |
| href="svn-dav-securityspace-survey.html">graph of public Subversion | |
| DAV servers</a>.</p> | |
| <div class="h2" id="testimonials" title="testimonials"> | |
| <h2><a name="testimonials">Testimonials</a></h2> | |
| <ul> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong>Jason D. Lee of <a href="http://www.hobbylobby.com/">Hobby Lobby</a></strong> | |
| <tt><a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=22868">(15 Dec 2004)</a></tt></p> | |
| <p><em>I work for a large retailer in the US. We are currently | |
| going through a certification process with VISA. Part of the | |
| compliance demands are that we track all router and switch | |
| configuration changes, noting what changes were made and who | |
| made them. We had a vendor come in and demo a very complicated | |
| system that did the job, but was priced at around $80,000. Even | |
| in the middle of a $1M+ project, that's a lot of money. When | |
| one of the network administrators told me what the price tag | |
| was, I immediately pointed him at Subversion. A few days later | |
| of testing and developing methodology, we now have the router | |
| configs for our 300+ stores as well as our corporate routers | |
| safely stored and tracked in Subversion. Our network | |
| administrators use TortoiseSVN for all of the commits, and those | |
| with access can view the history using WebSVN, and all this cost | |
| us one 1U server, which was reclaimed from a decommissioned | |
| server cluster. It has been fast, stable and easy to use. | |
| Here's a big thank you to the entire Subversion team, especially | |
| the ones who tireless answer questions on IRC. You have built | |
| an amazing system that I recommend every chance I get.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Jason Lee<br/> | |
| Programmer/Analyst<br/> | |
| Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong><a href="http://www.bieberlabs.com/">Ron Bieber</a></strong> | |
| <tt><a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=72516">(23 July 2004)</a></tt></p> | |
| <p><em>I currently manage a group of about 20 developers for a | |
| Fortune 500 company. We used CVS from January of 2001 until May | |
| of 2004 when we converted all of our repositories over to | |
| Subversion.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>The advantages we received from Subversion are immense. | |
| Before our conversion to CVS from VSS, we had two full time | |
| employees managing our production builds. Upon conversion to | |
| CVS we cut that resource count down to one. This resource | |
| handled all branching and merging activities, reporting | |
| activities, and manipulation of the CVS repository to move files | |
| while retaining history. The CVS branching and merging was just | |
| too cryptic (and took too long) for anyone to want to learn it. | |
| We had two CVS "experts" in house which included me and one of | |
| my direct reports. We were constantly called in to resolve | |
| issues. I myself spent a ton of time managing the support of | |
| the CVS repositories.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>After running across Subversion by chance in May of 2003, | |
| I started piloting it at home. As I used it more, I became | |
| convinced that this was a tool that my team needed in order to | |
| increase our productivity. After using it for a while, I was | |
| able to come up with some specific areas that justified our | |
| conversion to Subversion in order to maximize our productivity | |
| and code quality:</em></p> | |
| <ol> | |
| <li><em>Atomic commits - The lack of atomicity in commits was a | |
| huge problem for us with CVS. Subversion gives us the | |
| confidence that when we commit, everything went into the | |
| repository.</em></li> | |
| <li><em>The ability to back out changes before going to | |
| production--using an activity branching model, we can allow | |
| developers to branch per activity and only merge to the main | |
| source base after code reviews have been performed. If there | |
| are problems, we have one revision we can back out that | |
| includes the full changeset for that change. While the | |
| repository level revisioning was a shift for my developers to | |
| make that didn't happen immediately, it begins to make sense | |
| when an activity had to be removed from the build. In CVS we | |
| had to go through each file looking for revisions that were | |
| effected by a change. Subversion now manages this for | |
| us.</em></li> | |
| <li><em>Decreased build time. We run CruiseControl, and the | |
| checkout times we were experiencing with CVS, along with our | |
| requirement to tag of our source base after each build caused | |
| our automated build cycle to take an inordinate amount of | |
| time. With the restriction that all production changes MUST | |
| go through the build, this made emergency situations very | |
| stressful. The cheap copy functionality of Subversion | |
| decreased the time it took to get a change into source | |
| control, through the build system, and into deployment | |
| packages by 80%, greatly increasing our response time.</em></li> | |
| <li><em>Directory Versioning - this was a big deal that caused us | |
| to actually evaluate Clearcase at one point. The CVS Attic | |
| was killing us in checkout time and build time with the | |
| velocity of change we were making to the source base. When | |
| checkout times got too slow, we would have to wipe out the | |
| attic, effectively wiping out the history of our source base. | |
| With Subversion, we can remove something from the repository | |
| and not suffer performance penalties later (and still be able | |
| to get the deleted contents back).</em></li> | |
| <li><em>Simpler (and faster) branching - we no longer have a full | |
| time FTE managing branches. We are now cycling this activity | |
| through the group. Each developer can perform this activity, | |
| because it is now part of his daily work.</em></li> | |
| </ol> | |
| <p><em>As a manager, converting to Subversion was one of the best | |
| decisions I have made thus far that had a such a direct and | |
| highly visible impact on the productivity of my team.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>I hope this helps you make your case for Subversion. My | |
| personal opinion is that no one should even consider CVS at this | |
| point in time. Subversion is a great product and the support | |
| you get just on the mailing lists alone (from the development | |
| team no less!) is second to none.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong>Ross Mark of Controlling Edge Inc</strong> | |
| <tt><a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=72348">(22 July 2004)</a></tt></p> | |
| <p><em>For my own company Controlling Edge and at one of my | |
| customers S4 Technology (www.s4-technology.com) I have been | |
| running subversion since 0.17 and have never looked back. While | |
| there were a few issues initially we have never lost anything | |
| and currently have around 20 repositories containing everything | |
| from source code, documentation to complete product | |
| installations. We use subversion to install and upgrade the | |
| software on our servers. Once we copy the svn client onto the | |
| box the entire installation is a simple svn co plus the asvn to | |
| restore symlinks, devices and file permissions. Upgrading | |
| between releases with svn is great as it automatically merges | |
| any changes to local configuration files with new entries for | |
| the latest version. We even use svn to store file system images | |
| for our embedded devices (linux file system). Currently we have | |
| to check out the svn image on a server and then downloaded to | |
| our embedded device via rsync. We don't have the memory for a | |
| full svn client nor the disk space for the working copy but one | |
| day we will write our own svn client that can just do the | |
| checkout without the need for the wc support files or the memory | |
| overhead.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>For the past 9 years I had been installing CVS at | |
| customer sites that required version control and wouldn't | |
| hesitate now to recommend SVN instead.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong>John Szakmeister</strong> | |
| <tt><a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=72339">(21 July 2004)</a></tt></p> | |
| <p><em>I work for a government contracting facility. We develop | |
| everything from hardware, to full-fledged software applications, | |
| all of which supports mission-critical activities. We're | |
| currently using it on one of our most productive teams, and | |
| houses about 3 years worth of work (for about 14 developers). | |
| We started off with CVS, and found that the customer was | |
| constantly coming back with request for features and upgrades. | |
| Our small test projects would turn into fully-funded | |
| applications, and as such, we had to restructure them. It was | |
| just too painful with CVS, and we decided to look for something | |
| better.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>We found Subversion when it was at version 0.17. We | |
| started with just a few developers using it, and then migrated | |
| our other developers over time. I can say without question that | |
| it has been one of the best decisions that we've made. | |
| Subversion works better than CVS ever did. We can detect | |
| corruption before it gets to be a problem, we get atomic | |
| commits, and directory versioning. All of which has made our | |
| development process and our ability to adapt to the customers' | |
| ever-changing requirements that much easier. Plus, it natively | |
| supports both the Windows and Linux platforms (versus the mixing | |
| of CVS and CVSNT that we had before), which is our primary | |
| development platforms. We've never lost any data, and our | |
| developers have found it to be a very intuitive tool. | |
| Subversion has been rock-solid in our environment, and very much | |
| complements our software engineering practices. I can't speak | |
| highly enough of it.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong>Stuart Robertson of Absolute Systems, Inc</strong> | |
| <tt><a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=10651">(5 May 2004)</a></tt></p> | |
| <p><em>I introduced SVN to Absolute Systems Inc. | |
| (www.absolutesys.com) where I work about a year ago, and for | |
| about 8 months we ran internal SVN pilots, played around to gain | |
| experience and trust, etc.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>In the last 4 months we have migrated all of our internal | |
| product source repositories from Visual Source-Safe to SVN using | |
| an internally-written VSS-to-SVN migration tool.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Our largest SVN repository is now 3.7GB and currently has | |
| 68806 revisions. We are running SVN 1.0.1 + Apache 2.0.48 on | |
| Linux. ...</em></p> | |
| <p><em>SVN is a superb piece of work, and it is a *huge* step | |
| forward from VSS. To put things in perspective... previously we | |
| had 26 VSS databases for one product, primarily because of | |
| problems with VSS when the repositories grow large. As you can | |
| imagine, trying to manage product releases across so many | |
| repositories was really painful.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Now, with SVN, *all* of the artifacts for that same product are | |
| in a single repository, meaning that with a few cheap copy | |
| operations all of the sources that make up a given release can | |
| be grouped together. ...</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong>Gustavo Niemeyer of Conectiva Linux</strong> | |
| <tt><a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=6523">(25 February 2004)</a></tt></p> | |
| <p><em>I'm sure you are aware about the fantastic product you | |
| people have built, but I'd like to tell you a little story which | |
| should give new users some comfort about it.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Here in Conectiva we used to maintain our packages in a file | |
| based system, storing the latest SRPM packages, and also some | |
| old versions in case something bad happened. For a long time we | |
| wanted to build some system which would make our life easier in | |
| the daily work, and at the same time would give us some | |
| flexibility accessing historic information.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Shortening the history a lot, 1 year and 6 months ago, the | |
| first revision was committed into our repository:</em></p> | |
| <pre> | |
| % svn log https://svn.distro.conectiva/repos/cnc -r 1 | |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |
| r1 | niemeyer | 2002-08-27 17:12:04 -0300 (Tue, 27 Aug 2002) | 1 line | |
| Created basic structure. | |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |
| </pre> | |
| <p><em>Since then, 5 complete Conectiva Linux distributions were | |
| committed into the repository, and every single update in the | |
| distribution is done using Subversion. We've already surpassed | |
| 50000 revisions, in a 30GB repository. Even though we have had | |
| space, memory, and other kinds of problems around the | |
| repository, I'm proud to say we have never lost a single bit of | |
| information since then.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Based on this, the least I could do is sending a big THANK | |
| YOU for everyone involved in the project.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong>Mark Bohlman of Teledata Communications</strong> | |
| <tt><a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=14575">(21 July 2004)</a></tt></p> | |
| <p><em>Teledata Communications has been using Subversion for | |
| storing all of the source code on all our software products for | |
| the past year (since version 0.24). I have been very happy with | |
| the overall results and they way that developer impacts are | |
| minimal. We have not lost a single byte of code nor had any | |
| significant issues with using Subversion since the beginning. I | |
| attribute part of the productivity gains we have see in the past | |
| year to the move away from our prior system with locking (and | |
| the corresponding messages back and for to have something | |
| 'unlocked'). We continued to expand the use of the product to | |
| all groups in the company.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Mark Bohlman<br/> | |
| Software Development Manager</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong>Mark Grosberg, regarding <a | |
| href="http://www.asttool.com/">Assenmacher Specialty Tools</a> | |
| and <a href="http://www.gladesoft.com/">GladeSoft</a></strong> | |
| <tt><a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=14573">(21 July 2004)</a></tt></p> | |
| <p><em>AST makes automotive scan tools. We keep our source code | |
| for both the embedded side and the Windows interface side under | |
| Subversion. In addition we keep our (large) databases under | |
| Subversion as well.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>GladeSoft sells an embedded webserver toolkit and | |
| application framework. Subversion stores all of our code and | |
| documentation. In addition we store all of our business records | |
| in Subversion; so I guess we can't pull an Enron as easily | |
| :-)</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Neither company has lost a single change with | |
| Subversion. Both companies also have satellite workers who use | |
| SSL to access the source repositories. Subversion | |
| administration is relatively straightforward provided you use | |
| Apache so there are no permission problems. At AST most of the | |
| server administration is done by one of the mechanics who has | |
| other work to do.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong>Fog Creek Software on the | |
| <a href="http://www.fogcreek.com/FogBugz/docs/40/Articles/SourceControl/TortoiseSVN.html" | |
| >FogBugz and TortoiseSVN</a> integration</strong></p> | |
| <p><em>Fog Creek Software has been using Subversion as our | |
| source control system for a few years now. We switched awhile | |
| back from using CVS and have nothing but praise for Subversion. | |
| Anyone currently using CVS should bite the bullet and make the | |
| switch. It just works. The price is right, and best of all it | |
| integrates tightly with FogBugz. We support a whole host of | |
| <a href="http://www.fogcreek.com/FogBugz/docs/40/Articles/SourceControl/SourceControlIntegrationS.html" | |
| >Source Control Systems</a>, and adding new ones is very simple, | |
| but if you are starting out -- our recommendation is to start | |
| with Subversion.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Once you get Subversion set up and running, if you are on | |
| Windows, you will be amazed at how useful a good Subversion | |
| client can be. Steve King has created a fantastic piece of | |
| software, the <a href="http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/" | |
| >TortoiseSVN</a> client, and he has spent some time making sure | |
| that it works perfectly with FogBugz. [...]</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong>Robert Zeh of Error Free Software</strong> | |
| <tt><a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=14696">(23 July 2004)</a></tt></p> | |
| <p><em>I manage a 13 member application development group for a | |
| trading firm. There are about 9 other developers outside the | |
| group, and some others, so we have about 20 people using our | |
| subversion repository.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>For the past 10 years we used SCCS. It was very | |
| frustrating --- files could not be renamed or moved, developers | |
| would forget about locks they had acquired, and remote | |
| development was next to impossible. SCCS also made our limited | |
| Windows development painful (we are a Unix shop).</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Since we switched to subversion things have been much | |
| better. Our entire history was transported into our Subversion | |
| repository, so none of our history was lost. I wrote a Python | |
| script to transform it directly from SCCS to Subversion, and it | |
| was painless.</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Conflicts have been very rare. The ability to easily | |
| branch has been very useful; developers can make commits to | |
| branches without breaking other people's code. It's easier to | |
| see what people are working on as the commits hit our internal | |
| commit mailing list. Since we tag each release, we're able to | |
| determine which source code contributed to a release. | |
| TortiseSVN makes Windows development easy (no more ftping files | |
| over, or trying to build on a remotely mounted samba | |
| drive).</em></p> | |
| <p><em>Robert Zeh<br/> | |
| Manager, Application Development<br/> | |
| Error Free Software</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong>Chris Wein of Mobilygen</strong> | |
| <tt><a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=14695">(23 July 2004)</a></tt></p> | |
| <p><em>I also have had a very positive experience moving from | |
| CVS to Subversion in a commercial setting. We are a small-ish | |
| silicon valley startup that used to have everything in CVS. | |
| Shortly after I joined as s/w manager I switched the s/w team to | |
| SVN (0.37) with excellent results. We have had zero loss of | |
| data, zero down time, with effective branching, easy repository | |
| restructuring and constant time tags as our big positives. The | |
| entire company will be moving in the near-ish future based on | |
| our pilot. And of course the support from this list is | |
| fantastic.</em></p> | |
| <p><em><span style="color: red">[Fair play dictates that we also | |
| include the wish-list portion of Chris's | |
| testimonial...]</span></em></p> | |
| <p><em>As for my wishlist, it is short - completely seamless and | |
| foolproof tracking of merge history at the same level as the | |
| commercial tools. I don't want to remember revision numbers, I | |
| just want to branch and merge with the tool remembering common | |
| base versions etc. This is really the only thing I miss about | |
| ClearCase.</em></p> | |
| <p><em><span style="color: red">[We agree :-). Better merge tracking | |
| is on Subversion's long-term <a | |
| href="roadmap.html">roadmap</a>.]</span></em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li> | |
| <p><strong>Martin Pittenauer of <a href="http://www.codingmonkeys.de/subethaedit/">SubEthaEdit</a></strong> | |
| <tt>(2 June 2004)</tt></p> | |
| <p><em>We are using Subversion since version 0.17 and it never | |
| let us down. On contrary it provided a much better experience | |
| than any versioning system we have used before, including CVS | |
| and perforce. With Apple adding support for .svn files within | |
| NIBs with Xcode 1.2 we are certain that subversion is the ideal | |
| versioning platform for modern software development on Mac OS | |
| X.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| </ul> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="h2" id="open-source-projects-using-svn" | |
| title="open-source-projects-using-svn"> | |
| <h2>Open Source Projects Using Subversion</h2> | |
| <p style="font-style: italic;">This is not a complete list of all open | |
| source projects using Subversion, just some of the most recognizeable | |
| ones:</p> | |
| <ul> | |
| <li><p><strong>ASF</strong>: The Apache Software Foundation.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.apache.org/" | |
| >http://www.apache.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/"> | |
| http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/</a><br/> | |
| <em>The Apache Software Foundation is a community of many | |
| open-source software projects, including the popular Apache HTTP | |
| Server.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>KDE</strong>: The K Desktop Environment.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.kde.org/" | |
| >http://www.kde.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/"> | |
| svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/</a><br/> | |
| <em>KDE is a powerful Free Software graphical desktop | |
| environment for Linux and Unix workstations.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Samba</strong>: SMB services for *nix systems.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.samba.org/" | |
| >http://www.samba.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="svn://svnanon.samba.org/samba" | |
| >svn://svnanon.samba.org/samba</a><br/> | |
| <em>Samba is an Open Source/Free Software suite that provides | |
| seamless file and print services to SMB/CIFS clients.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Mono</strong>: an open-source implementation of | |
| C#/.NET.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.mono-project.com/" | |
| >http://www.mono-project.com/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="svn://mono.myrealbox.com/source/" | |
| >svn://mono.myrealbox.com/source/</a><br/> | |
| <em>Mono is a comprehensive open source development platform based | |
| on the .NET framework.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>PuTTY</strong>: Win32 SSH/Telnet implementation<br/> | |
| Project site: <a | |
| href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/" | |
| >http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="svn://ixion.tartarus.org/main/putty/" | |
| >svn://ixion.tartarus.org/main/putty/</a><br/> | |
| <em>PuTTY is a free implementation of Telnet and SSH for Win32 and | |
| Unix platforms, along with an xterm terminal emulator.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Zope</strong>: web application | |
| server/framework.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.zope.org/" | |
| >http://www.zope.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope" | |
| >svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope</a><br/> | |
| <em>Zope is an open source application server for building content | |
| managements, intranets, portals, and custom applications.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Plone</strong>: content management system.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://plone.org/" | |
| >http://plone.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="http://svn.plone.org/" | |
| >http://svn.plone.org/</a><br/> | |
| <em>Plone is an out-of-the-box ready content management system | |
| built on the powerful and free Zope Application server.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Xiph</strong>: open-source multimedia | |
| protocols.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.xiph.org/" | |
| >http://www.xiph.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="http://svn.xiph.org/" | |
| >http://svn.xiph.org/</a><br/> | |
| <em>The Xiph.Org Foundation is a non-profit corporation best known | |
| for the development of the Ogg Vorbis sound compression format and | |
| the Ogg Theora video codec.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Debian</strong>: a popular Linux distribution.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.debian.org/" | |
| >http://www.debian.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="http://svn.debian.org/" | |
| >http://svn.debian.org/</a><br/> | |
| <em>Debian GNU/Linux is a free operating system.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>CUPS (Common UNIX Printing System)</strong>: printing | |
| services for Unix-based OS's.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.cups.org/" | |
| >http://www.cups.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="http://svn.easysw.com/public/cups/trunk/" | |
| >http://svn.easysw.com/public/cups/trunk/</a><br/> | |
| <em>CUPS provides a portable printing layer for Unix-based | |
| operating systems.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Irssi</strong>: a GPL-licensed IRC client.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.irssi.org/" | |
| >http://www.irssi.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="http://svn.irssi.org/" | |
| >http://svn.irssi.org/</a><br/> | |
| <em>Irssi is a popular and powerful text mode IRC client for | |
| Unix-like operating systems.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Linux From Scratch</strong>: a Linux distribution | |
| built from source.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/" | |
| >http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="svn://linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/" | |
| >svn://linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/</a><br/> | |
| <em>A Linux distribution which gives you the power to build your | |
| own, customized system and teaches you how a Linux system works | |
| internally.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Conectiva</strong>: a South American Linux | |
| distribution.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.conectiva.com.br/" | |
| >http://www.conectiva.com.br/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="https://moin.conectiva.com.br/RepositorySystem" | |
| >https://moin.conectiva.com.br/RepositorySystem</a><br/> | |
| <em>Conectiva develops and distributes the Conectiva Linux | |
| distribution, which is aimed at use in Latin America.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Trac</strong>: a project management system.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/"> | |
| http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="http://svn.edgewall.com/repos/trac/" | |
| >http://svn.edgewall.com/repos/trac/</a><br/> | |
| <em>Trac is an enhanced wiki and issue tracking system for | |
| software development projects. It provides an interface to | |
| Subversion, an integrated wiki and convenient report | |
| facilities.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>GNU Enterprise</strong>: enterprise application | |
| development.<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/"> | |
| http://www.gnuenterprise.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="http://www.gnuenterprise.org/developers/svn.php" | |
| >http://www.gnuenterprise.org/developers/svn.php</a> | |
| <br/> | |
| <em>GNU Enterprise (GNUe) is a meta-project which is part of the | |
| overall GNU Project. GNUe's goal is to develop enterprise-class | |
| data-aware applications as Free software.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Ethereal</strong>: a free network protocol | |
| analyzer<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.ethereal.com/" | |
| >http://www.ethereal.com/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="http://anonsvn.ethereal.com/ethereal/" | |
| >http://anonsvn.ethereal.com/ethereal/</a><br/> | |
| <em>Ethereal is a free network protocol analyzer with all the | |
| standard features you would expect in a protocol analyzer, and | |
| several features not seen in any other product.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>Netfilter</strong>: the Linux packet manipulation | |
| framework<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://www.netfilter.org/" | |
| >http://www.netfilter.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="https://svn.netfilter.org/netfilter/" | |
| >https://svn.netfilter.org/netfilter/</a><br/> | |
| <em>netfilter is a set of hooks inside the Linux kernel that | |
| allows kernel modules to register callback functions with the | |
| network stack. iptables is a generic table structure for the | |
| definition of rulesets.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| <li><p><strong>TWiki</strong>: a web based collaboration | |
| platform<br/> | |
| Project site: <a href="http://twiki.org/" | |
| >http://twiki.org/</a><br/> | |
| Repository: <a href="http://ntwiki.ethermage.net/svn/twiki/" | |
| >http://ntwiki.ethermage.net/svn/twiki/</a><br/> | |
| <em>TWiki is a structured wiki, typically used to run a project | |
| development space, a document management system, a knowledge | |
| base, or any other groupware tool on the network.</em></p> | |
| </li> | |
| </ul> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| </body> | |
| </html> | |