blob: 96e524acf2d9dfd7a4fde43ba038d29bdc9a3c71 [file] [log] [blame]
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
* distributed with this work for additional information
* regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
* to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
* "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
* with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
* software distributed under the License is distributed on an
* "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
* KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
* specific language governing permissions and limitations
* under the License.
*/
package org.apache.qpid.server.virtualhost.plugins;
import org.apache.commons.configuration.CompositeConfiguration;
import org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException;
import org.apache.commons.configuration.XMLConfiguration;
import org.apache.qpid.server.configuration.plugins.SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration;
import org.apache.qpid.server.util.InternalBrokerBaseCase;
/**
* Unit test the QueueConfiguration processing.
*
* This is slightly awkward as the {@link SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration}
* requries that a policy be available.
* <p>
* So all the Valid test much catch the ensuing {@link ConfigurationException} and
* validate that the error is due to a lack of a valid policy.
*/
public class SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfigurationTest extends InternalBrokerBaseCase
{
/**
* Test a fully loaded configuration file.
*
* It is not an error to have all control values specified.
* <p>
* Here we need to catch the {@link ConfigurationException} that ensues due to lack
* of a policy plugin.
*/
public void testConfigLoadingValidConfig()
{
SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration config = new SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration();
XMLConfiguration xmlconfig = new XMLConfiguration();
xmlconfig.addProperty("messageAge", "60000");
xmlconfig.addProperty("depth", "1024");
xmlconfig.addProperty("messageCount", "10");
// Create a CompositeConfiguration as this is what the broker uses
CompositeConfiguration composite = new CompositeConfiguration();
composite.addConfiguration(xmlconfig);
try
{
config.setConfiguration("", composite);
fail("No Policies are avaialbe to load in a unit test");
}
catch (ConfigurationException e)
{
assertTrue("Exception message incorrect, was: " + e.getMessage(),
e.getMessage().startsWith("No Slow Consumer Policy specified. Known Policies:["));
}
}
/**
* When we do not specify any control value then a {@link ConfigurationException}
* must be thrown to remind us.
*/
public void testConfigLoadingMissingConfig()
{
SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration config = new SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration();
XMLConfiguration xmlconfig = new XMLConfiguration();
// Create a CompositeConfiguration as this is what the broker uses
CompositeConfiguration composite = new CompositeConfiguration();
composite.addConfiguration(xmlconfig);
try
{
config.setConfiguration("", composite);
fail("No Policies are avaialbe to load in a unit test");
}
catch (ConfigurationException e)
{
assertEquals("At least one configuration property('messageAge','depth'" +
" or 'messageCount') must be specified.", e.getMessage());
}
}
/**
* Setting messageAge on its own is enough to have a valid configuration
*
* Here we need to catch the {@link ConfigurationException} that ensues due to lack
* of a policy plugin.
*/
public void testConfigLoadingMessageAgeOk()
{
SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration config = new SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration();
XMLConfiguration xmlconfig = new XMLConfiguration();
xmlconfig.addProperty("messageAge", "60000");
// Create a CompositeConfiguration as this is what the broker uses
CompositeConfiguration composite = new CompositeConfiguration();
composite.addConfiguration(xmlconfig);
try
{
config.setConfiguration("", composite);
fail("No Policies are avaialbe to load in a unit test");
}
catch (ConfigurationException e)
{
assertTrue("Exception message incorrect, was: " + e.getMessage(),
e.getMessage().startsWith("No Slow Consumer Policy specified. Known Policies:["));
}
}
/**
* Setting depth on its own is enough to have a valid configuration.
*
* Here we need to catch the {@link ConfigurationException} that ensues due to lack
* of a policy plugin.
*/
public void testConfigLoadingDepthOk()
{
SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration config = new SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration();
XMLConfiguration xmlconfig = new XMLConfiguration();
xmlconfig.addProperty("depth", "1024");
// Create a CompositeConfiguration as this is what the broker uses
CompositeConfiguration composite = new CompositeConfiguration();
composite.addConfiguration(xmlconfig);
try
{
config.setConfiguration("", composite);
fail("No Policies are avaialbe to load in a unit test");
}
catch (ConfigurationException e)
{
assertTrue("Exception message incorrect, was: " + e.getMessage(),
e.getMessage().startsWith("No Slow Consumer Policy specified. Known Policies:["));
}
}
/**
* Setting messageCount on its own is enough to have a valid configuration.
*
* Here we need to catch the {@link ConfigurationException} that ensues due to lack
* of a policy plugin.
*/
public void testConfigLoadingMessageCountOk()
{
SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration config = new SlowConsumerDetectionQueueConfiguration();
XMLConfiguration xmlconfig = new XMLConfiguration();
xmlconfig.addProperty("messageCount", "10");
// Create a CompositeConfiguration as this is what the broker uses
CompositeConfiguration composite = new CompositeConfiguration();
composite.addConfiguration(xmlconfig);
try
{
config.setConfiguration("", composite);
fail("No Policies are avaialbe to load in a unit test");
}
catch (ConfigurationException e)
{
assertTrue("Exception message incorrect, was: " + e.getMessage(),
e.getMessage().startsWith("No Slow Consumer Policy specified. Known Policies:["));
}
}
}