| <html> |
| <head> |
| <title>IRIX OpenOffice.org Porting Site - TESTING STATUS</title> |
| <meta HTTP-EQUIV="content-type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> |
| </head> |
| <body> |
| <table cellpadding="0" align="center" class=navbar> |
| <tr align="center"> |
| <td valign="top" align="left" width="2%" height="21"> |
| </td> |
| <td width="24%" class=navlink> |
| <a class=bar href="../index.html">HOME</a> |
| </td> |
| <td width="25%" class=navlink> |
| <a class=bar href="../build_inst/index.html">BUILD INSTRUCTIONS</a> |
| </td> |
| <td width="25%" class=navsel> |
| TESTING STATUS |
| </td> |
| <td width="24%" class=navlink> |
| <a class=bar href="../issues/index.html">ISSUES</a> |
| </td> |
| </tr> |
| <tr align="center"> |
| <td class=blank colspan=3> |
| |
| </td> |
| <td class=subnavsel> |
| GENERAL |
| </td> |
| <td class=blank colspan=1> |
| |
| </td> |
| </tr> |
| <tr align="center"> |
| <td class=blank colspan=3> |
| |
| </td> |
| <td class=subnavlink> |
| <a class=bar href="OO641.html">OpenOffice 641</a> |
| </td> |
| <td class=blank colspan=1> |
| |
| </td> |
| </tr> |
| <tr align="center"> |
| <td class=blank colspan=3> |
| |
| </td> |
| <td class=subnavlink> |
| <a class=bar href="OOO_S1.html">OpenOffice 1.x.x</a> |
| </td> |
| <td class=blank colspan=1> |
| |
| </td> |
| </tr> |
| |
| </table> |
| |
| <h1 >TESTING STATUS</h1> |
| <p> In our last most stable build of OpenOffice.org (OpenOffice641 / OO641B), |
| we ran many test suites that exist in the OpenOffice.org tree. We obtained |
| mixed results from all these tests, some passing, some failing, and others not |
| even compiling.</p> |
| <p> As the OOO_STABLE_1 branch is no where near as stable as the 641B branch on |
| IRIX, we thought it was time to revisit those tests once again, to check for |
| any regressions.</p> |
| <p>The tests are currently a work in progress, so it may be a little while |
| before the table in the OpenOffice 1.x.x section is complete.</p> |
| </body> |
| </html> |
