| <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> |
| <html lang="en"> |
| <head> |
| <style type="text/css"> |
| #toptabsmod li {display: inline;list-style-type: none;padding-right: 20px;} |
| </style> |
| <title>Recensioni</title> |
| |
| |
| </head> |
| |
| <body> |
| |
| |
| <div class="strut"> </div> |
| |
| |
| |
| <div id="bodycol"> |
| <p class="nonscreen"><a name="content">start:</a></p> |
| |
| <div id="toptabsmod"> |
| <ul> |
| |
| <li style="display:none;"><a href="index.html">Prodotto</a></li> |
| |
| <li><a href="writer.html">Writer</a></li> |
| |
| <li><a href="calc.html">Calc</a></li> |
| |
| <li><a href="impress.html">Impress</a></li> |
| |
| <li><a href="draw.html">Draw</a></li> |
| |
| <li><a href="base.html">Base</a></li> |
| |
| <li><a href="math.html">Math</a></li> |
| |
| <li style="display:none;"><a href="suite.html">Suite</a></li> |
| |
| <li class="th"><a href="reviews.html">Recensioni</a></li> |
| |
| <li style="display:none;"><a href="studies.html">Studi</a></li> |
| |
| <li style="display:none;"><a href="more.html">Altro</a></li> |
| |
| </ul> |
| |
| </div> |
| |
| <br /> |
| |
| <br /> |
| |
| <hr noshade="noshade" size="1" /> |
| <h2>Recensioni |
| </h2> |
| |
| <p> <i>As |
| OpenOffice.org Version 2 is currently available only in pre-release |
| versions. there are no independent reviews of the finished product. In |
| the meantime, please read the keynote review of Version 1</i> |
| </p> |
| |
| <h3>Keynote Review</h3> |
| |
| <p> |
| <b>PC Pro Magazine</b> |
| delivers its verdict on Version 1.1.2: <cite>The |
| best all-round office suite is also the cheapest. With excellent |
| Microsoft compatibility, a consistent interface and a good network of |
| ad-hoc support, this is the king of the business tools.</cite><br /> |
| |
| OpenOffice.org tops the poll and earns <img src="reviews_files/6stars.gif" alt="six stars" border="0" height="10" width="69" /> in a comparative |
| review of office suites in <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/labs/64884/openoffice-112.html">Issue |
| 224, December 04</a>. The magazine's |
| review team conclude that they <cite>fully |
| endorse OpenOffice over and above Microsoft Office 2003 for both home |
| and corporate use.</cite></p> |
| |
| <h3>OOo 2.0 previews</h3> |
| |
| <ul> |
| |
| <li> <a href="http://computerworld.com.sg/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&articleid=2742&pubid=3&issueid=66">Migrating |
| to OpenOffice.org 90 per cent cheaper than to Microsoft |
| Office 12 </a>Vol. 11 Issue 23 | 23 September - 6 October 2005 <b>Compterworld</b> |
| <cite> |
| The industry's two major office suites, Microsoft Office and |
| OpenOffice.org, will soon be releasing new versions. Recent research |
| into these versions by large government departments indicates that for |
| many sites, it is now 10 times cheaper to migrate to the new |
| OpenOffice.org 2.0 than upgrading to Microsoft Office 12.</cite> </li> |
| |
| <li> <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/worktech/cst-fin-andy22.html">OpenOffice |
| is great alternative to Microsoft</a> |
| by Andy Ihnatko, September 22, 2005 <b>Chicago |
| Sun-Times</b> <cite>...you |
| won't use it because you hate Microsoft or because you |
| don't like tying your whole office's (or your government's) ability to |
| function to the proprietary whims of one single company. Maybe you |
| won't even use it just because it'll cost you $0 to Microsoft Office's |
| $365. You'll use it because OpenOffice 2.0 is an attractive and |
| compelling suite of office apps in its own right.</cite> </li> |
| |
| <li> <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1851001,00.asp">Openoffice.org</a> |
| 09.06.05 <b>PCMag.com</b> <cite> Unlike the slow, |
| clunky |
| original version, version 2.0 of this free productivity suite is |
| surprisingly slick and highly compatible with Microsoft Office file |
| formats. |
| It even offers features not found in its expensive Microsoft |
| counterpart.</cite> </li> |
| |
| <li> <a href="http://www.vnunet.com/personal-computer-world/software/2140229/openoffice-org">Openoffice.org |
| 2 - a new, improved version that gives Microsoft a run for its money</a> |
| By Cliff Joseph, 22 Jul 2005 <b>Personal |
| Computer World </b> <cite>...there's |
| no doubt version 2 is more than powerful enough for most home and |
| business users and can certainly give Microsoft a run for its money, |
| especially since it's free.</cite> </li> |
| |
| <li> <a href="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/1c5e53b8-b205-11d9-8c61-00000e2511c8.html">Open |
| source moves into Microsoft's Office block</a> |
| By Simon London Published: April 21 2005 03:00 <b>Financial |
| Times</b> <cite>The |
| latest incarnation of OpenOffice was last month released for testing by |
| users. Early reviews say it marks a big advance over earlier versions |
| of the free word processing, spreadsheet and presentation package.</cite> |
| </li> |
| |
| <li> <a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/117952/">Looking |
| forward to OpenOffice.org 2.0</a> |
| Joe Brockmeier, 5 Jan 2003, <b>Linux |
| Weekly News</b> <cite>From |
| a test of the 1.9.65 build, it's pretty clear that the OpenOffice.org |
| project has a way to go before it's finished. However, this release |
| does provide a pretty good overview of what to expect, and it does look |
| like 2.0 will be a formidable suite when finished.</cite> </li> |
| |
| </ul> |
| |
| </div> |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| </body> |
| </html> |
