| |
| |
| <!--#include virtual="/doctype.html" --> |
| <html> |
| <head> |
| <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> |
| |
| <link href="/css/ooo.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"> |
| <title>Ocene</title> |
| <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> |
| |
| <script src="https://www.apachecon.com/event-images/snippet.js"></script> |
| </head> |
| <body> |
| <!--#include virtual="/brand.html" --> |
| <div id="topbara"> |
| <!--#include virtual="/topnav.html" --> |
| <div id="breadcrumbsa"><a href="/">home</a> » <a href="/sl/">sl</a> » <a href="/sl/produkt/">produkt</a></div> |
| </div> |
| <div id="clear"></div> |
| |
| |
| <div id="content"> |
| |
| <div id="toptabs"> |
| <ul> <li><a href="index.html">Product</a></li> |
| <li><a href="writer.html">Writer</a></li> |
| <li><a href="calc.html">Calc</a></li> <li><a href="impress.html">Impress</a></li> <li><a href="draw.html">Draw</a></li> <li><a href="base.html">Base</a></li> <li><a href="math.html">Math</a></li> <li><a href="suite.html">Paket</a></li> <li class="th"><a href="reviews.html">Ocene</a></li> |
| <li><a href="studies.html">Študije</a></li> |
| <li><a href="more.html">Več</a></li> |
| </ul></div><br><br><hr noshade="noshade" size="1"><h2>Product |
| Reviews |
| </h2><p><i>As |
| OpenOffice.org has only just been released, there are few independent |
| reviews of the finished product. For a full comparative review of |
| office productivity suites, |
| <a href="#OOo_1.0_Keynote_Review">read the keynote review |
| of Version 1</a></i> |
| </p><h3>OOo 2.0 Reviews</h3> |
| <ul><li> |
| <a href="">Microsoft Works Suite 2006</a> Software |
| Review, February 21, 2006 <b>PC Advisor</b> |
| <cite>Home users, small businesses and educational facilities on |
| super-tight budgets are now regarding OpenOffice.org as a valid |
| alternative to the dominance of Microsoft's mighty Office Suites.</cite> |
| </li><li> |
| <a href="http://www.syracuse.com/news/poststandard/index.ssf?/base/news-0/1140084398219190.xml&coll=1">Free |
| Office software subs well for costly version</a> By Al Fasoldt |
| Sunday, February 19, 2006 <b>Syracuse Post Standard</b> |
| <cite>I've been using a free alternative to Office for many |
| years, through a number of revisions. |
| The latest version, called OpenOffice, is exceptional in some ways. |
| Considering the price, it's downright outstanding |
| </cite></li> |
| <li><a href="http://www.democratandchronicle.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060219/BUSINESS0103/602190331/1001/BUSINESS">Open |
| Office a lot like Microsoft product - and free |
| </a>By Nick Francesco - February 19, 2006 <b>Rochester |
| Democrat and Chronicle</b> |
| <cite>Open Office (or, as they prefer, OpenOffice.org) is a |
| complete |
| office suite, much like the more familiar Microsoft Office. For those |
| of you |
| who are familiar with Microsoft Office, you'll feel right at home with |
| OpenOffice.org ... Give OpenOffice.org a try. It's free and you can |
| have it loaded on the same |
| computer at the same time as Microsoft Office. |
| </cite></li><li><a href="http://www.linux-magazine.com/issue/63/OpenOffice.org_2.0_Review.pdf">The |
| latest OpenOffice comes with new file formats and many new features |
| [PDF, 1336 kB]</a> |
| By Michael Bona Issue 63: February 2006 <b>Linux Magazine</b> |
| <cite>All in all, the developers have done a great job with |
| OpenOffice 2.0. This office package can do everything better than its |
| predecessor, just like you would expect of any healthy five-year-old. |
| </cite></li><li><a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1876087,00.asp">OpenOffice.org |
| 2.0 Has Edge over Its StarOffice 8 Cousin</a> |
| By Jason Brooks October 21, 2005 <b>eWeek.com</b> |
| <cite>eWEEK Labs' tests of OpenOffice.org 2.0 show that it is an |
| excellent office productivity suite option, particularly in the case of |
| Linux distributions, which typically come bundled with a |
| well-integrated version of the suite.</cite> |
| </li><li><a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1874157,00.asp">Why |
| OpenOffice.org 2.0 Is Your Best Choice</a> |
| By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols October 20, 2005 <b>eWeek.com</b> |
| <cite>OpenOffice.org's price tag: 0. Microsoft Office |
| Professional Edition 2003's list price: $499 new, $329 as an upgrade. |
| Day in and day out office usability? For all practical purposes, |
| they're about the same. |
| So, which would you rather 'buy?'</cite> |
| </li></ul><h3>OOo 2.0 previews</h3> |
| <ul> <li> <a href="http://computerworld.com.sg/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&articleid=2742&pubid=3&issueid=66">Migrating |
| to OpenOffice.org 90 per cent cheaper than to Microsoft |
| Office 12 </a>Vol. 11 Issue 23 | 23 September - 6 October 2005 <b>Compterworld</b> |
| <cite>The industry's two major office suites, Microsoft Office |
| and |
| OpenOffice.org, will soon be releasing new versions. Recent research |
| into these versions by large government departments indicates that for |
| many sites, it is now 10 times cheaper to migrate to the new |
| OpenOffice.org 2.0 than upgrading to Microsoft Office 12.</cite> </li> |
| <li> <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/worktech/cst-fin-andy22.html">OpenOffice |
| is great alternative to Microsoft</a> |
| by Andy Ihnatko, September 22, 2005 <b>Chicago |
| Sun-Times</b> <cite>...you |
| won't use it because you hate Microsoft or because you |
| don't like tying your whole office's (or your government's) ability to |
| function to the proprietary whims of one single company. Maybe you |
| won't even use it just because it'll cost you $0 to Microsoft Office's |
| $365. You'll use it because OpenOffice 2.0 is an attractive and |
| compelling suite of office apps in its own right.</cite> </li> |
| <li> <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1851001,00.asp">Openoffice.org</a> |
| 09.06.05 <b>PCMag.com</b> <cite> Unlike the slow, |
| clunky |
| original version, version 2.0 of this free productivity suite is |
| surprisingly slick and highly compatible with Microsoft Office file |
| formats. |
| It even offers features not found in its expensive Microsoft |
| counterpart.</cite> </li> <li> <a href="http://www.vnunet.com/personal-computer-world/software/2140229/openoffice-org">Openoffice.org |
| 2 - a new, improved version that gives Microsoft a run for its money</a> |
| By Cliff Joseph, 22 Jul 2005 <b>Personal |
| Computer World </b> <cite>...there's |
| no doubt version 2 is more than powerful enough for most home and |
| business users and can certainly give Microsoft a run for its money, |
| especially since it's free.</cite> </li> <li> <a href="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/1c5e53b8-b205-11d9-8c61-00000e2511c8.html">Open |
| source moves into Microsoft's Office block</a> |
| By Simon London Published: April 21 2005 03:00 <b>Financial |
| Times</b> <cite>The |
| latest incarnation of OpenOffice was last month released for testing by |
| users. Early reviews say it marks a big advance over earlier versions |
| of the free word processing, spreadsheet and presentation package.</cite> |
| </li> <li> <a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/117952/">Looking |
| forward to OpenOffice.org 2.0</a> |
| Joe Brockmeier, 5 Jan 2003, <b>Linux |
| Weekly News</b> <cite>From |
| a test of the 1.9.65 build, it's pretty clear that the OpenOffice.org |
| project has a way to go before it's finished. However, this release |
| does provide a pretty good overview of what to expect, and it does look |
| like 2.0 will be a formidable suite when finished.</cite> </li> |
| </ul><h3><a name="OOo_1.0_Keynote_Review"></a>OOo |
| 1.0 Keynote Review</h3> |
| <p><b>PC Pro Magazine</b> |
| delivers its verdict on Version 1.1.2: <cite>The |
| best all-round office suite is also the cheapest. With excellent |
| Microsoft compatibility, a consistent interface and a good network of |
| ad-hoc support, this is the king of the business tools.</cite><br> |
| OpenOffice.org tops the poll and earns <img src="pix/6stars.gif" alt="six stars" border="0" height="10" width="69"> |
| in a comparative |
| review of office suites in <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/labs/64884/openoffice-112.html">Issue |
| 224, December 04</a>. The magazine's |
| review team conclude that they <cite>fully |
| endorse OpenOffice over and above Microsoft Office 2003 for both home |
| and corporate use.</cite></p> |
| |
| |
| </div> |
| <!--#include virtual="/footer.html" --> |
| </body> |
| </html> |