| <html> |
| <head> |
| <meta HTTP-EQUIV=CONTENT-TYPE CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8"> |
| <title>Challenge</title> |
| </head> |
| <body text=#000000 bgcolor=#FFFFFF link=#0000CC vlink=#000080 alink=#0000CC> |
| <center> |
| <a href="text0.html">First page</a> <a href="text14.html">Back</a> <a href="text16.html">Continue</a> <a href="text25.html">Last page</a> <a href="img15.html">Graphics</a></center><br> |
| <h1><b>How do we score?</b></h1><p> |
| <br> |
| <h3>Notes:</h3> |
| The next stage of the workshop took a very quick look at the OpenOffice.org Community, the product, and its target markets. Participants were asked to vote on a show of hands:<br> |
| <br> |
| 1=Poor<br> |
| 5=Excellent<br> |
| <br> |
| for each of the ten items shown on the slide. From this emerged a view as to whether each factor was a <i>strength</i> or a <i>weakness</i> for OpenOffice.org.<br> |
| <br> |
| Overall, the OpenOffice.org product was judged to be in a stronger position than the Community. <br> |
| <br> |
| It says something for the overall optimism of the participants that 3.5 seemed to be the most common score...<br> |
| </body> |
| </html> |
