blob: 404a50c9599749f19b7c0463b9977452093eb414 [file] [log] [blame]
From users-return-4950-apmail-httpd-users-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Tue Apr 09 14:46:49 2002
Return-Path: <users-return-4950-apmail-httpd-users-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 30873 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2002 14:46:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:users-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:users@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 30849 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2002 14:46:46 -0000
Received: from eos.telenet-ops.be (195.130.132.40)
by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Apr 2002 14:46:46 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by eos.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP
id F20A2203DF; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 16:46:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from beluga.i-vision.be (D5E09971.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.153.113])
by eos.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B673F200B0; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 16:46:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from kaluga (kaluga.i-vision.be [192.168.1.15])
by beluga.i-vision.be (Postfix) with SMTP
id 046AB13FCF; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 16:45:55 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <007801c1dfd5$68f32d80$0f01a8c0@kaluga>
From: "Nick De Decker" <nick@i-vision.be>
To: <users@httpd.apache.org>
Cc: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Subject: slow apache 2.0
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 16:47:02 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
Hello,
I'm testing apache 2.0 but i'm having trouble with it.
Benchmarks show very slow results when the number of concurrent users get
high.
i tested the prefork/worker settings but nothing seems to help.
tested with ab :
ab -n 10000 -c 1000 http://192.168.1.253/index.html (978 bytes page)
apache 1.3.24 => 1036 requests per second, response times of 110 ms
apache 2.0.35 => 68 requests per second, average response time of 15000 ms.
So why did the make apache 2.0 so slow ? 3 years of work for a server
that's 100 slower ?
Help me out please,
Nick De Decker
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org