| /* |
| * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one |
| * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file |
| * distributed with this work for additional information |
| * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file |
| * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the |
| * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance |
| * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at |
| * |
| * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| * |
| * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, |
| * software distributed under the License is distributed on an |
| * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY |
| * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the |
| * specific language governing permissions and limitations |
| * under the License. |
| * |
| */ |
| package org.apache.directory.server.core.schema; |
| |
| |
| import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; |
| import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse; |
| import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue; |
| import static org.junit.Assert.fail; |
| |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.constants.SchemaConstants; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.entry.DefaultEntry; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.entry.DefaultModification; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.entry.Entry; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.entry.Modification; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.entry.ModificationOperation; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.exception.LdapException; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.exception.LdapInvalidDnException; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.message.ResultCodeEnum; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.name.Dn; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.name.Rdn; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.schema.MatchingRule; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.schema.SchemaManager; |
| import org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.schema.comparators.StringComparator; |
| import org.apache.directory.ldap.client.api.LdapConnection; |
| import org.apache.directory.server.core.annotations.CreateDS; |
| import org.apache.directory.server.core.integ.FrameworkRunner; |
| import org.apache.directory.server.core.integ.IntegrationUtils; |
| import org.junit.Before; |
| import org.junit.Ignore; |
| import org.junit.Test; |
| import org.junit.runner.RunWith; |
| |
| |
| /** |
| * A test case which tests the addition of various schema elements |
| * to the ldap server. |
| * |
| * @author <a href="mailto:dev@directory.apache.org">Apache Directory Project</a> |
| */ |
| @RunWith(FrameworkRunner.class) |
| @CreateDS(name = "MetaMatchingRuleHandlerIT") |
| public class MetaMatchingRuleHandlerIT extends AbstractMetaSchemaObjectHandler |
| { |
| private static final String DESCRIPTION0 = "A test matchingRule"; |
| private static final String DESCRIPTION1 = "An alternate description"; |
| |
| private static final String OID = "1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.1.100000"; |
| private static final String NEW_OID = "1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.1.100001"; |
| |
| public static SchemaManager schemaManager; |
| private static LdapConnection connection; |
| |
| |
| @Before |
| public void setup() throws Exception |
| { |
| super.init(); |
| connection = IntegrationUtils.getAdminConnection( getService() ); |
| schemaManager = getService().getSchemaManager(); |
| } |
| |
| |
| private void createComparator() throws Exception |
| { |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=comparators,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| Entry entry = new DefaultEntry( |
| dn, |
| "objectClass: top", |
| "objectClass: metaTop", |
| "objectClass: metaComparator", |
| "m-fqcn: " + StringComparator.class.getName(), |
| "m-oid: " + OID, |
| "m-description: A test comparator" ); |
| |
| // Addition |
| connection.add( entry ); |
| |
| assertTrue( isOnDisk( dn ) ); |
| assertTrue( schemaManager.getComparatorRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // Test all core methods with normal operational pathways |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // Test Add operation |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| @Test |
| public void testAddMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema() throws Exception |
| { |
| createComparator(); |
| |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| Entry entry = new DefaultEntry( |
| dn, |
| "objectClass: top", |
| "objectClass: metaTop", |
| "objectClass: metaMatchingRule", |
| "m-oid", OID, |
| "m-syntax", SchemaConstants.INTEGER_SYNTAX, |
| "m-description", DESCRIPTION0 ); |
| |
| // Pre-checks |
| assertFalse( isOnDisk( dn ) ); |
| assertFalse( schemaManager.getAttributeTypeRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| |
| // Addition |
| connection.add( entry ); |
| |
| // Post-checks |
| assertTrue( schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| assertEquals( schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( OID ), "apachemeta" ); |
| assertTrue( isOnDisk( dn ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testAddMatchingRuleToDisabledSchema() throws Exception |
| { |
| createComparator(); |
| |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=nis,ou=schema" ); |
| Entry entry = new DefaultEntry( |
| dn, |
| "objectClass: top", |
| "objectClass: metaTop", |
| "objectClass: metaMatchingRule", |
| "m-oid", OID, |
| "m-syntax", SchemaConstants.INTEGER_SYNTAX, |
| "m-description", DESCRIPTION0 ); |
| |
| connection.add( entry ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "adding new matchingRule to disabled schema should not register it into the registries", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| assertTrue( isOnDisk( dn ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testAddMatchingRuleToUnloadedSchema() throws Exception |
| { |
| createComparator(); |
| |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=notloaded,ou=schema" ); |
| Entry entry = new DefaultEntry( |
| dn, |
| "objectClass: top", |
| "objectClass: metaTop", |
| "objectClass: metaMatchingRule", |
| "m-oid", OID, |
| "m-syntax", SchemaConstants.INTEGER_SYNTAX, |
| "m-description", DESCRIPTION0 ); |
| |
| try |
| { |
| connection.add( entry ); |
| fail( "Should not be there" ); |
| } |
| catch ( LdapException le ) |
| { |
| // Expected result |
| } |
| |
| assertFalse( "adding new matchingRule to disabled schema should not register it into the registries", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| assertFalse( isOnDisk( dn ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // Test Delete operation |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| @Test |
| public void testDeleteMatchingRuleFromEnabledSchema() throws Exception |
| { |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| testAddMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema(); |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule should be removed from the registry after being deleted", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| assertTrue( isOnDisk( dn ) ); |
| |
| connection.delete( dn ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "matchingRule should be removed from the registry after being deleted", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| |
| try |
| { |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| fail( "matchingRule lookup should fail after deleting it" ); |
| } |
| catch ( LdapException e ) |
| { |
| } |
| |
| assertFalse( isOnDisk( dn ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testDeleteMatchingRuleFromDisabledSchema() throws Exception |
| { |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=nis,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| testAddMatchingRuleToDisabledSchema(); |
| |
| assertFalse( "matchingRule should be removed from the registry after being deleted", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| assertTrue( isOnDisk( dn ) ); |
| |
| connection.delete( dn ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "matchingRule should be removed from the registry after being deleted", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| assertFalse( isOnDisk( dn ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // Test Modify operation |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| @Test |
| @Ignore |
| public void testModifyMatchingRuleWithModificationItems() throws Exception |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema(); |
| |
| MatchingRule mr = schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getDescription(), DESCRIPTION0 ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getSyntax().getOid(), SchemaConstants.INTEGER_SYNTAX ); |
| |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| Modification mod1 = new DefaultModification( |
| ModificationOperation.REPLACE_ATTRIBUTE, "m-description", DESCRIPTION1 ); |
| Modification mod2 = new DefaultModification( |
| ModificationOperation.REPLACE_ATTRIBUTE, "m-syntax", SchemaConstants.DIRECTORY_STRING_SYNTAX ); |
| |
| connection.modify( dn, mod1, mod2 ); |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule OID should still be present", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| |
| assertEquals( "matchingRule schema should be set to apachemeta", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( OID ), "apachemeta" ); |
| |
| mr = schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getDescription(), DESCRIPTION1 ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getSyntax().getOid(), SchemaConstants.DIRECTORY_STRING_SYNTAX ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| @Ignore |
| public void testModifyMatchingRuleWithAttributes() throws Exception |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema(); |
| |
| MatchingRule mr = schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getDescription(), DESCRIPTION0 ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getSyntax().getOid(), SchemaConstants.INTEGER_SYNTAX ); |
| |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| Modification mod1 = new DefaultModification( |
| ModificationOperation.REPLACE_ATTRIBUTE, "m-description", DESCRIPTION1 ); |
| Modification mod2 = new DefaultModification( |
| ModificationOperation.REPLACE_ATTRIBUTE, "m-syntax", SchemaConstants.DIRECTORY_STRING_SYNTAX ); |
| |
| connection.modify( dn, mod1, mod2 ); |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule OID should still be present", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| |
| assertEquals( "matchingRule schema should be set to apachemeta", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( OID ), "apachemeta" ); |
| |
| mr = schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getDescription(), DESCRIPTION1 ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getSyntax().getOid(), SchemaConstants.DIRECTORY_STRING_SYNTAX ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // Test Rename operation |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| @Test |
| @Ignore |
| public void testRenameMatchingRule() throws Exception |
| { |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| testAddMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema(); |
| |
| Rdn rdn = new Rdn( "m-oid=" + NEW_OID ); |
| connection.rename( dn, rdn ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "old matchingRule OID should be removed from the registry after being renamed", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| |
| try |
| { |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| fail( "matchingRule lookup should fail after renaming the matchingRule" ); |
| } |
| catch ( LdapException e ) |
| { |
| } |
| |
| assertTrue( schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( NEW_OID ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // Test Move operation |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| @Test |
| @Ignore |
| public void testMoveMatchingRule() throws Exception |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema(); |
| |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| Dn newDn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apache,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| connection.move( dn, newDn ); |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule OID should still be present", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| |
| assertEquals( "matchingRule schema should be set to apache not apachemeta", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( OID ), "apache" ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| @Ignore |
| public void testMoveMatchingRuleAndChangeRdn() throws Exception |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema(); |
| |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| Dn newDn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + NEW_OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apache,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| connection.moveAndRename( dn, newDn ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "old matchingRule OID should NOT be present", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| |
| assertTrue( "new matchingRule OID should be present", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( NEW_OID ) ); |
| |
| assertEquals( "matchingRule with new oid should have schema set to apache NOT apachemeta", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( NEW_OID ), "apache" ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // Test move, rename, and delete when a MR exists and uses the Normalizer |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // @Test |
| // public void testDeleteSyntaxWhenInUse() throws Exception |
| // { |
| // Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| // |
| // testAddSyntax(); |
| // addDependeeMatchingRule(); |
| // |
| // try |
| // { |
| // connection.delete( dn ); |
| // fail( "should not be able to delete a syntax in use" ); |
| // } |
| // catch( LdapException e ) |
| // { |
| // //assertEquals( e.@getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // assertTrue( "syntax should still be in the registry after delete failure", |
| // getLdapSyntaxRegistry().hasSyntax( OID ) ); |
| // } |
| |
| // public void testMoveSyntaxWhenInUse() throws NamingException |
| // { |
| // testAddSyntax(); |
| // addDependeeMatchingRule(); |
| // |
| // Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| // Dn newDn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apache,ou=schema" ); |
| // |
| // try |
| // { |
| // super.schemaRoot.rename( dn, newDn ); |
| // fail( "should not be able to move a syntax in use" ); |
| // } |
| // catch( LdapUnwillingToPerformException e ) |
| // { |
| // assertEquals( e.getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // assertTrue( "syntax should still be in the registry after move failure", |
| // registries.getLdapSyntaxRegistry().hasSyntax( OID ) ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // |
| // public void testMoveSyntaxAndChangeRdnWhenInUse() throws NamingException |
| // { |
| // testAddSyntax(); |
| // addDependeeMatchingRule() |
| // |
| // Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| // |
| // Dn newDn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + NEW_OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apache,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| // try |
| // { |
| // super.schemaRoot.moveAndRename( dn, JndiUtils.toName( newdn ) ); |
| // fail( "should not be able to move a syntax in use" ); |
| // } |
| // catch( LdapUnwillingToPerformException e ) |
| // { |
| // assertEquals( e.getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // assertTrue( "syntax should still be in the registry after move failure", |
| // registries.getSyntaxRegistry().hasSyntax( OID ) ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // |
| |
| // Need to add body to this method which creates a new matchingRule after |
| // the matchingRule addition code has been added. |
| |
| // private void addDependeeMatchingRule() |
| // { |
| // throw new NotImplementedException(); |
| // } |
| // |
| // public void testRenameNormalizerWhenInUse() throws NamingException |
| // { |
| // Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| // |
| // testAddSyntax(); |
| // addDependeeMatchingRule(); |
| // |
| // Rdn rdn = new Rdn( "m-oid=" + NEW_OID ); |
| // |
| // try |
| // { |
| // super.schemaRoot.rename( dn, rdn ); |
| // fail( "should not be able to rename a syntax in use" ); |
| // } |
| // catch( LdapUnwillingToPerformException e ) |
| // { |
| // assertEquals( e.getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // assertTrue( "syntax should still be in the registry after rename failure", |
| // registries.getSyntaxRegistry().hasSyntax( OID ) ); |
| // } |
| |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // Let's try some freaky stuff |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| |
| @Test |
| @Ignore |
| public void testMoveMatchingRuleToTop() throws Exception |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema(); |
| |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| Dn top = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID ); |
| |
| try |
| { |
| connection.move( dn, top ); |
| fail( "should not be able to move a matchingRule up to ou=schema" ); |
| } |
| catch ( LdapInvalidDnException e ) |
| { |
| assertEquals( e.getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.NAMING_VIOLATION ); |
| } |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule should still be in the registry after move failure", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| @Ignore |
| public void testMoveMatchingRuleToComparatorContainer() throws Exception |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema(); |
| |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| Dn newDn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=comparatos,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| try |
| { |
| connection.move( dn, newDn ); |
| fail( "should not be able to move a matchingRule into comparators container" ); |
| } |
| catch ( LdapInvalidDnException e ) |
| { |
| assertEquals( e.getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.NAMING_VIOLATION ); |
| } |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule should still be in the registry after move failure", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| @Ignore |
| public void testMoveMatchingRuleToDisabledSchema() throws Exception |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema(); |
| |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| // nis is inactive by default |
| Dn newDn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=nis,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| connection.move( dn, newDn ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "matchingRule OID should no longer be present", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| @Ignore |
| public void testMoveMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema() throws Exception |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRuleToDisabledSchema(); |
| |
| // nis is inactive by default |
| Dn dn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=nis,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "matchingRule OID should NOT be present when added to disabled nis schema", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| |
| Dn newDn = new Dn( "m-oid=" + OID + ",ou=matchingRules,cn=apachemeta,ou=schema" ); |
| |
| connection.move( dn, newDn ); |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule OID should be present when moved to enabled schema", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().contains( OID ) ); |
| |
| assertEquals( "matchingRule should be in apachemeta schema after move", |
| schemaManager.getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( OID ), "apachemeta" ); |
| } |
| } |
