| /* |
| * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one |
| * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file |
| * distributed with this work for additional information |
| * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file |
| * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the |
| * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance |
| * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at |
| * |
| * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| * |
| * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, |
| * software distributed under the License is distributed on an |
| * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY |
| * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the |
| * specific language governing permissions and limitations |
| * under the License. |
| * |
| */ |
| package org.apache.directory.server.core.schema; |
| |
| |
| import org.apache.directory.server.constants.MetaSchemaConstants; |
| import org.apache.directory.server.core.DirectoryService; |
| import org.apache.directory.server.core.integ.CiRunner; |
| import static org.apache.directory.server.core.integ.IntegrationUtils.getSchemaContext; |
| import org.apache.directory.server.schema.registries.MatchingRuleRegistry; |
| import org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.constants.SchemaConstants; |
| import org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.exception.LdapInvalidNameException; |
| import org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.message.AttributeImpl; |
| import org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.message.AttributesImpl; |
| import org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.message.ModificationItemImpl; |
| import org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.message.ResultCodeEnum; |
| import org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.name.LdapDN; |
| import org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.schema.MatchingRule; |
| import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; |
| import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue; |
| import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse; |
| import static org.junit.Assert.fail; |
| import org.junit.Test; |
| import org.junit.runner.RunWith; |
| |
| import javax.naming.NamingException; |
| import javax.naming.directory.Attribute; |
| import javax.naming.directory.Attributes; |
| import javax.naming.directory.DirContext; |
| |
| |
| /** |
| * A test case which tests the addition of various schema elements |
| * to the ldap server. |
| * |
| * @author <a href="mailto:dev@directory.apache.org">Apache Directory Project</a> |
| * @version $Rev$ |
| */ |
| @RunWith ( CiRunner.class ) |
| public class MetaMatchingRuleHandlerIT |
| { |
| private static final String DESCRIPTION0 = "A test matchingRule"; |
| private static final String DESCRIPTION1 = "An alternate description"; |
| |
| private static final String INTEGER_SYNTAX_OID = "1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27"; |
| private static final String DIRSTR_SYNTAX_OID = "1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15"; |
| |
| private static final String OID = "1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.1.100000"; |
| private static final String NEW_OID = "1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.0.1.100001"; |
| |
| |
| public static DirectoryService service; |
| |
| |
| private static MatchingRuleRegistry getMatchingRuleRegistry() |
| { |
| return service.getRegistries().getMatchingRuleRegistry(); |
| } |
| |
| |
| /** |
| * Gets relative DN to ou=schema. |
| * |
| * @param schemaName the name of the schema |
| * @return the dn of the container of matchingRules for a schema |
| * @throws NamingException on error |
| */ |
| private LdapDN getMatchingRuleContainer( String schemaName ) throws NamingException |
| { |
| return new LdapDN( "ou=matchingRules,cn=" + schemaName ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // Test all core methods with normal operational pathways |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testAddMatchingRule() throws NamingException |
| { |
| Attributes attrs = new AttributesImpl(); |
| Attribute oc = new AttributeImpl( SchemaConstants.OBJECT_CLASS_AT, "top" ); |
| oc.add( MetaSchemaConstants.META_TOP_OC ); |
| oc.add( MetaSchemaConstants.META_MATCHING_RULE_OC ); |
| attrs.put( oc ); |
| attrs.put( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT, OID ); |
| attrs.put( MetaSchemaConstants.M_SYNTAX_AT, INTEGER_SYNTAX_OID ); |
| attrs.put( MetaSchemaConstants.M_DESCRIPTION_AT, DESCRIPTION0 ); |
| |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| getSchemaContext( service ).createSubcontext( dn, attrs ); |
| |
| assertTrue( getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| assertEquals( getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( OID ), "apachemeta" ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testDeleteMatchingRule() throws NamingException |
| { |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| testAddMatchingRule(); |
| |
| getSchemaContext( service ).destroySubcontext( dn ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "matchingRule should be removed from the registry after being deleted", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| |
| try |
| { |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| fail( "matchingRule lookup should fail after deleting it" ); |
| } |
| catch( NamingException e ) |
| { |
| } |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testRenameMatchingRule() throws NamingException |
| { |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| testAddMatchingRule(); |
| |
| LdapDN newdn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| newdn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + NEW_OID ); |
| getSchemaContext( service ).rename( dn, newdn ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "old matchingRule OID should be removed from the registry after being renamed", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| |
| try |
| { |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| fail( "matchingRule lookup should fail after renaming the matchingRule" ); |
| } |
| catch( NamingException e ) |
| { |
| } |
| |
| assertTrue( getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( NEW_OID ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testMoveMatchingRule() throws NamingException |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRule(); |
| |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| LdapDN newdn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apache" ); |
| newdn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| getSchemaContext( service ).rename( dn, newdn ); |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule OID should still be present", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| |
| assertEquals( "matchingRule schema should be set to apache not apachemeta", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( OID ), "apache" ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testMoveMatchingRuleAndChangeRdn() throws NamingException |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRule(); |
| |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| LdapDN newdn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apache" ); |
| newdn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + NEW_OID ); |
| |
| getSchemaContext( service ).rename( dn, newdn ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "old matchingRule OID should NOT be present", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| |
| assertTrue( "new matchingRule OID should be present", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( NEW_OID ) ); |
| |
| assertEquals( "matchingRule with new oid should have schema set to apache NOT apachemeta", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( NEW_OID ), "apache" ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testModifyMatchingRuleWithModificationItems() throws NamingException |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRule(); |
| |
| MatchingRule mr = getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getDescription(), DESCRIPTION0 ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getSyntax().getOid(), INTEGER_SYNTAX_OID ); |
| |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| ModificationItemImpl[] mods = new ModificationItemImpl[2]; |
| Attribute attr = new AttributeImpl( MetaSchemaConstants.M_DESCRIPTION_AT, DESCRIPTION1 ); |
| mods[0] = new ModificationItemImpl( DirContext.REPLACE_ATTRIBUTE, attr ); |
| attr = new AttributeImpl( MetaSchemaConstants.M_SYNTAX_AT, DIRSTR_SYNTAX_OID ); |
| mods[1] = new ModificationItemImpl( DirContext.REPLACE_ATTRIBUTE, attr ); |
| getSchemaContext( service ).modifyAttributes( dn, mods ); |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule OID should still be present", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| |
| assertEquals( "matchingRule schema should be set to apachemeta", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( OID ), "apachemeta" ); |
| |
| mr = getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getDescription(), DESCRIPTION1 ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getSyntax().getOid(), DIRSTR_SYNTAX_OID ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testModifyMatchingRuleWithAttributes() throws NamingException |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRule(); |
| |
| MatchingRule mr = getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getDescription(), DESCRIPTION0 ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getSyntax().getOid(), INTEGER_SYNTAX_OID ); |
| |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| Attributes mods = new AttributesImpl(); |
| mods.put( MetaSchemaConstants.M_DESCRIPTION_AT, DESCRIPTION1 ); |
| mods.put( MetaSchemaConstants.M_SYNTAX_AT, DIRSTR_SYNTAX_OID ); |
| getSchemaContext( service ).modifyAttributes( dn, DirContext.REPLACE_ATTRIBUTE, mods ); |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule OID should still be present", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| |
| assertEquals( "matchingRule schema should be set to apachemeta", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( OID ), "apachemeta" ); |
| |
| mr = getMatchingRuleRegistry().lookup( OID ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getDescription(), DESCRIPTION1 ); |
| assertEquals( mr.getSyntax().getOid(), DIRSTR_SYNTAX_OID ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // Test move, rename, and delete when a MR exists and uses the Normalizer |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| |
| |
| // public void testDeleteSyntaxWhenInUse() throws NamingException |
| // { |
| // LdapDN dn = getSyntaxContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| // dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| // testAddSyntax(); |
| // addDependeeMatchingRule(); |
| // |
| // try |
| // { |
| // super.schemaRoot.destroySubcontext( dn ); |
| // fail( "should not be able to delete a syntax in use" ); |
| // } |
| // catch( LdapOperationNotSupportedException e ) |
| // { |
| // assertEquals( e.getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // assertTrue( "syntax should still be in the registry after delete failure", |
| // registries.getSyntaxRegistry().hasSyntax( OID ) ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // |
| // public void testMoveSyntaxWhenInUse() throws NamingException |
| // { |
| // testAddSyntax(); |
| // addDependeeMatchingRule(); |
| // |
| // LdapDN dn = getSyntaxContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| // dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| // |
| // LdapDN newdn = getSyntaxContainer( "apache" ); |
| // newdn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| // |
| // try |
| // { |
| // super.schemaRoot.rename( dn, newdn ); |
| // fail( "should not be able to move a syntax in use" ); |
| // } |
| // catch( LdapOperationNotSupportedException e ) |
| // { |
| // assertEquals( e.getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // assertTrue( "syntax should still be in the registry after move failure", |
| // registries.getSyntaxRegistry().hasSyntax( OID ) ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // |
| // public void testMoveSyntaxAndChangeRdnWhenInUse() throws NamingException |
| // { |
| // testAddSyntax(); |
| // addDependeeMatchingRule() |
| // |
| // LdapDN dn = getSyntaxContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| // dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| // |
| // LdapDN newdn = getSyntaxContainer( "apache" ); |
| // newdn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + NEW_OID ); |
| // |
| // try |
| // { |
| // super.schemaRoot.rename( dn, newdn ); |
| // fail( "should not be able to move a syntax in use" ); |
| // } |
| // catch( LdapOperationNotSupportedException e ) |
| // { |
| // assertEquals( e.getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // assertTrue( "syntax should still be in the registry after move failure", |
| // registries.getSyntaxRegistry().hasSyntax( OID ) ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // |
| |
| // Need to add body to this method which creates a new matchingRule after |
| // the matchingRule addition code has been added. |
| |
| // private void addDependeeMatchingRule() |
| // { |
| // throw new NotImplementedException(); |
| // } |
| // |
| // public void testRenameNormalizerWhenInUse() throws NamingException |
| // { |
| // LdapDN dn = getSyntaxContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| // dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| // testAddSyntax(); |
| // addDependeeMatchingRule(); |
| // |
| // LdapDN newdn = getSyntaxContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| // newdn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + NEW_OID ); |
| // |
| // try |
| // { |
| // super.schemaRoot.rename( dn, newdn ); |
| // fail( "should not be able to rename a syntax in use" ); |
| // } |
| // catch( LdapOperationNotSupportedException e ) |
| // { |
| // assertEquals( e.getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM ); |
| // } |
| // |
| // assertTrue( "syntax should still be in the registry after rename failure", |
| // registries.getSyntaxRegistry().hasSyntax( OID ) ); |
| // } |
| |
| |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| // Let's try some freaky stuff |
| // ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testMoveMatchingRuleToTop() throws NamingException |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRule(); |
| |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| LdapDN top = new LdapDN(); |
| top.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| try |
| { |
| getSchemaContext( service ).rename( dn, top ); |
| fail( "should not be able to move a matchingRule up to ou=schema" ); |
| } |
| catch( LdapInvalidNameException e ) |
| { |
| assertEquals( e.getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.NAMING_VIOLATION ); |
| } |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule should still be in the registry after move failure", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testMoveMatchingRuleToComparatorContainer() throws NamingException |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRule(); |
| |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| LdapDN newdn = new LdapDN( "ou=comparators,cn=apachemeta" ); |
| newdn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| try |
| { |
| getSchemaContext( service ).rename( dn, newdn ); |
| fail( "should not be able to move a matchingRule into comparators container" ); |
| } |
| catch( LdapInvalidNameException e ) |
| { |
| assertEquals( e.getResultCode(), ResultCodeEnum.NAMING_VIOLATION ); |
| } |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule should still be in the registry after move failure", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testAddMatchingRuleToDisabledSchema() throws NamingException |
| { |
| Attributes attrs = new AttributesImpl(); |
| Attribute oc = new AttributeImpl( SchemaConstants.OBJECT_CLASS_AT, "top" ); |
| oc.add( MetaSchemaConstants.META_TOP_OC ); |
| oc.add( MetaSchemaConstants.META_MATCHING_RULE_OC ); |
| attrs.put( oc ); |
| attrs.put( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT, OID ); |
| attrs.put( MetaSchemaConstants.M_SYNTAX_AT, INTEGER_SYNTAX_OID ); |
| attrs.put( MetaSchemaConstants.M_DESCRIPTION_AT, DESCRIPTION0 ); |
| |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "nis" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| getSchemaContext( service ).createSubcontext( dn, attrs ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "adding new matchingRule to disabled schema should not register it into the registries", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testMoveMatchingRuleToDisabledSchema() throws NamingException |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRule(); |
| |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| // nis is inactive by default |
| LdapDN newdn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "nis" ); |
| newdn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| getSchemaContext( service ).rename( dn, newdn ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "matchingRule OID should no longer be present", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| } |
| |
| |
| @Test |
| public void testMoveMatchingRuleToEnabledSchema() throws NamingException |
| { |
| testAddMatchingRuleToDisabledSchema(); |
| |
| // nis is inactive by default |
| LdapDN dn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "nis" ); |
| dn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| assertFalse( "matchingRule OID should NOT be present when added to disabled nis schema", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| |
| LdapDN newdn = getMatchingRuleContainer( "apachemeta" ); |
| newdn.add( MetaSchemaConstants.M_OID_AT + "=" + OID ); |
| |
| getSchemaContext( service ).rename( dn, newdn ); |
| |
| assertTrue( "matchingRule OID should be present when moved to enabled schema", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().hasMatchingRule( OID ) ); |
| |
| assertEquals( "matchingRule should be in apachemeta schema after move", |
| getMatchingRuleRegistry().getSchemaName( OID ), "apachemeta" ); |
| } |
| } |
