| # Test decoding of subtransactions whose top-transaction is before restart |
| # point. Such transactions won't be streamed as we stream only complete |
| # transactions, but it is good to test that they don't cause any problem. |
| |
| setup |
| { |
| SELECT 'init' FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('isolation_slot', 'test_decoding'); -- must be first write in xact |
| CREATE TABLE harvest(apples integer); |
| CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION subxacts() returns void as $$ |
| BEGIN |
| FOR i in 1 .. 128 LOOP |
| BEGIN |
| INSERT INTO harvest VALUES (42); |
| EXCEPTION |
| WHEN OTHERS THEN |
| RAISE; |
| END; |
| END LOOP; |
| END; $$LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'; |
| } |
| |
| teardown |
| { |
| DROP TABLE IF EXISTS harvest; |
| SELECT 'stop' FROM pg_drop_replication_slot('isolation_slot'); |
| } |
| |
| session "s0" |
| setup { SET synchronous_commit=on; } |
| step "s0_begin" { BEGIN; } |
| step "s0_first_subxact" { |
| DO LANGUAGE plpgsql $$ |
| BEGIN |
| BEGIN |
| INSERT INTO harvest VALUES (41); |
| EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN RAISE; |
| END; |
| END $$; |
| } |
| step "s0_many_subxacts" { select subxacts(); } |
| step "s0_commit" { COMMIT; } |
| |
| session "s1" |
| setup { SET synchronous_commit=on; } |
| step "s1_begin" { BEGIN; } |
| step "s1_dml" { INSERT INTO harvest VALUES (43); } |
| step "s1_commit" { COMMIT; } |
| |
| session "s2" |
| setup { SET synchronous_commit=on; } |
| step "s2_checkpoint" { CHECKPOINT; } |
| step "s2_get_changes" { SELECT data FROM pg_logical_slot_get_changes('isolation_slot', NULL, NULL, 'include-xids', '0', 'skip-empty-xacts', '1'); } |
| step "s2_get_changes_suppress_output" { SELECT null n FROM pg_logical_slot_get_changes('isolation_slot', NULL, NULL, 'include-xids', '0', 'skip-empty-xacts', '1') GROUP BY n; } |
| |
| # The first checkpoint establishes the potential restart point (aka |
| # restart_lsn) for the slot after the initial subxact. The second checkpoint |
| # followed by get_changes will ensure that the potential restart point will |
| # become the actual restart point. We do get_changes twice because if one |
| # more xl_running_xacts record had slipped before our s0_commit, then the |
| # potential restart point won't become actual restart point. The s1's open |
| # transaction till get_changes holds the potential restart point to our first |
| # checkpoint location. |
| permutation "s0_begin" "s0_first_subxact" "s2_checkpoint" "s1_begin" "s1_dml" "s0_many_subxacts" "s0_commit" "s2_checkpoint" "s2_get_changes_suppress_output" "s2_get_changes_suppress_output" "s1_commit" "s2_get_changes" |