blob: 9be24c8aa1c231ff1d28c60e03a7d8d368e0fe85 [file] [log] [blame]
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
* distributed with this work for additional information
* regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
* to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
* "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
* with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package org.apache.cassandra.db.rows;
import java.util.Comparator;
import org.apache.cassandra.config.ColumnDefinition;
import org.apache.cassandra.db.marshal.*;
/**
* A {@code Comparator} use to determine which version of a {@link ColumnDefinition} should be used.
* <p>
* We can sometimes get 2 different versions of the definition of a give column due to differing types. This can happen
* in at least 2 cases:
* <ul>
* <li>for UDT, where new fields can be added (see CASSANDRA-13776).</li>
* <li>pre-CASSANDRA-12443, when we allowed type altering. And while we don't allow it anymore, it is possible
* to still have sstables with metadata mentioning an old pre-altering type (such old version of pre-altering
* types will be eventually eliminated from the system by compaction and thanks to this comparator, but we
* cannot guarantee when that's fully done).</li>
* </ul>
*/
final class ColumnDefinitionVersionComparator implements Comparator<ColumnDefinition>
{
public static final Comparator<ColumnDefinition> INSTANCE = new ColumnDefinitionVersionComparator();
private ColumnDefinitionVersionComparator()
{
}
@Override
public int compare(ColumnDefinition v1, ColumnDefinition v2)
{
assert v1.ksName.equals(v2.ksName)
&& v1.cfName.equals(v2.cfName)
&& v1.name.equals(v2.name) : v1.debugString() + " != " + v2.debugString();
AbstractType<?> v1Type = v1.type;
AbstractType<?> v2Type = v2.type;
// In most cases, this is used on equal types, and on most types, equality is cheap (most are singleton classes
// and just use reference equality), so evacuating that case first.
if (v1Type.equals(v2Type))
return 0;
// If those aren't the same type, one must be "more general" than the other, that is accept strictly more values.
if (v1Type.isValueCompatibleWith(v2Type))
{
// Note: if both accept the same values, there is really no good way to prefer one over the other and so we
// consider them equal here. In practice, this mean we have 2 types that accepts the same values but are
// not equal. For internal types, TimestampType/DataType/LongType is, afaik, the only example, but as user
// can write custom types, who knows when this can happen. But excluding any user custom type weirdness
// (that would really be a bug of their type), such types should only differ in the way they sort, and as
// this method is only used for regular/static columns in practice, where sorting has no impact whatsoever,
// it shouldn't matter too much what we return here.
return v2Type.isValueCompatibleWith(v1Type) ? 0 : 1;
}
else if (v2Type.isValueCompatibleWith(v1Type))
{
return -1;
}
else
{
// Neither is a super type of the other: something is pretty wrong and we probably shouldn't ignore it.
throw new IllegalArgumentException(String.format("Found 2 incompatible versions of column %s in %s.%s: one " +
"of type %s and one of type %s (but both types are incompatible)",
v1.name, v1.ksName, v1.cfName, v1Type, v2Type));
}
}
}