\u001B[1mSYNOPSIS\u001B[0m
    ${project.description}

    Original Maven URLs:
        \u001B[33mmvn:${pkgGroupId}/jibx-bind/${pkgVersion}\u001B[0m
        \u001B[33mmvn:${pkgGroupId}/jibx-extras/${pkgVersion}\u001B[0m
        \u001B[33mmvn:${pkgGroupId}/jibx-run/${pkgVersion}\u001B[0m

\u001B[1mDESCRIPTION\u001B[0m
    JiBX is a tool for binding XML data to Java objects. It's extremely flexible, allowing you to start from existing
    Java code and generate an XML schema, start from an XML schema and generate Java code, or bridge your existing code
    to a schema that represents the same data. It also provides very high performance, outperforming all other Java
    data binding tools across a wide variety of tests.

    How does JiBX manage to provide both flexibility and performance? The key is using binding definition documents to
    specify how your Java objects are converted to or from XML, combined with bytecode enhancement to embed the
    conversion code directly into your classes. The bytecode enhancement is done by executing one of the JiBX components
    (the binding compiler) after your Java classes have been compiled. Once the binding compiler has run and your
    classes have been enhanced with the JiBX binding code, you can continue the normal steps you take in assembling your
    application (such as building jar files, etc.).

    The second JiBX component is the binding runtime. The enhanced class files generated by the binding compiler use
    this runtime component both for actually building objects from an XML input document (called unmarshalling, in data
    binding terms) and for generating an XML output document from objects (called marshalling). The runtime uses a
    separate XML parser (either one based on the XMLPull open source API, or on the StAX Java standard), but is
    otherwise self-contained.

    Performance was originally part of the inspiration for writing JiBX, and JiBX has consistently delivered performance
    far ahead of the field. We're not aware of any recent published performance comparisions between data binding
    frameworks, but you can view some older results from the BindMark tests, along with a similar study focused around
    Web services performance.. These sets of results are both from late 2005, but our own testing shows that little
    has changed since then.

\u001B[1mSEE ALSO\u001B[0m
    \u001B[36mhttp://jibx.sourceforge.net/\u001B[0m