Organize the components in your UI
Laying out components in Royale works a bit differently than in the Adobe or Apache Flex SDKs. If you don’t care about the why and want to get to the how, skip ahead to the “Royale Layouts" section.
The traditional Flex SDKs used a three-phase, optionally frame-delayed, validation mechanism. Two phases were top-down; one phase was bottom up. The idea was to handle any change anywhere. Also percentages were defined as a percentage of the non-fixed area of the container. Just about every object that didn’t have explicit widths and heights got measured because measurements helped define the minimum sizes for things with percentage widths and heights.
This system worked well, but with some annoying issues:
Royale works with the browser in which it is running:
When managing layouts, Royale recognizes three scenarios:
If the component has an explicitly set width but not height or vice versa, the component falls into scenario 1 or 2 based on whether the unspecified dimension has a percentage set on it.
Another, more subtle principle, is that width is slightly more important than height. That’s the way browsers seem to work, so if a choice has to be made, the layout will try to determine the width before the height.
Unlike the traditional Flex SDKs, a percentage in Royale is a strict percentage of the parent’s size. Royale makes no attempt to figure out what things can be shrunk or stretched. This saves having to loop through the children twice: once to figure out how much room there is, and a second time to shrink or stretch things.
Another difference is that, in Royale, a parent does not watch its children’s display properties for changes. If the height and/or width of some child object changes, the parent and its parents may not refresh their layout. You may have to dispatch a “layoutNeeded” event or use an MXML tag to cause a “layoutNeeded” event to dispatch. If we start to see common scenarios where everyone is setting up these update events, we may build in somehow the ability for parents to monitor changes in their childrens' sizes. For example, the Image and ImageButton components force a layout in their parents when the image content arrives, since that is a common pattern.
This fits with Royale's “just-in-time” instead of “just-in-case” philosophy. In the dozens of containers and components available in the Royale component sets, only three require “layoutNeeded” events.
At the beginning of the application, the default Application class sets the initial view to the size of the Flash Player or browser window. This generally causes a single top-down pass through all of the children that weren’t already sized to content or sized explicitly. When that pass done, if a dimension is sized to content, the layout sets the size of that dimension.
ActionScript vs JavaScript When creating your own layout, take advantage of the platforms' abilities. Keep in mind that the ActionScript version of a layout mimics what you can do with HTML. The VerticalLayout, for example, just sets the HTML elements that support the FlexJS components to have a display style of ‘block’ so they appear on separate lines.
The ActionScript version of a layout may be more complex since it has to do more work. The ActionScript version of VerticalLayout is more complex and provides a really good example of how to write a layout.
You may be able to create layouts which can be cross-compiled from ActionScript to JavaScript, but you may get better performance if you write native JavaScript layouts.
Layouts work with the container classes (Group, View, Container, DataContainer, List) and the chart classes. A container has an area called the “contentView” where the items go that are being laid out. The contentView is different depending on the platform (HTML, Flash) and the type of container. For Group, the contentView is always itself, while for Container, the contentView is specific to the platform. On the HTML platform, the contentView is almost always the same as the component since DIV can do much of the work.
On the Flash platform, the contentView is managed by a Viewport which is responsible for the size and position of the contentView. If a Container is being scrolled, a ScrollableViewport is used instead of the plain Viewport; in the browser/HTML, scrolling is done by the DIV simply by adding “overflow:auto” to its style sheet.
As mentioned above, containers may be sized explicitly or by their content. This can happen in either or both dimensions (for example, a container that specifies a width and not a height). When a container is being sized by its content, the layout is used to determine the container's size by calculating a bounding box that surrounds the children once the layout has been run.
Some layouts need to know the amount of space they have to work with. The contentView can provide that through its width and height properties. When a container is being sized by its content, the layout may not get valid width and/or height values from the contentView. In this case, the layout must assume the container is infinitely wide or tall or the layout can make some assumptions and impose its own constraints.
Layouts such as VerticalLayout and HorizontalLayout do not depend on the container having a size. These layouts simply follow an algorithm to position the children, which makes them ideal candidates for containers whose size must be determined by the content.
The layout handles offsets introduced by padding and margin styles. On the HTML platform, the DIV (along with CSS) handles padding, margins, and borders. The SWF implementation of a layout has to account for these things and handle them appropriately.
If you look at the ActionScript version of VerticalLayout, you'll see how padding and margin values are obtained from the components and used to calculate the placement of the items in the layout. Your layout may need to do the same thing if it is to respect padding and margin when your application is run from Flash.
Using a container as a base for a new component is often a good idea if you want to take advantage of layouts. In Royale, the container's view bead handles the majority of the work. For Containers, this is the ContainerView bead (for Group it is the GroupView bead). Unless your component needs special handling for scrolling you can extend Group and GroupView for your view bead.
Use a layout to arrange the sub-elements of your component. If you need to, write a custom layout to handle special cases such as elements that should not be included in the layout (“chrome” elements).
Your custom view bead may also need to override some protected functions which are called during the layout process:
On the Flash platform, the Container class uses a simple component, ContainerContentArea, for the contentView that holds the elements to be displayed and arranged by the layout. The Royale framework automatically adds any elements specified in MXML to the contentView. If your component needs to generate, or programmatically fill, the content of a container, you may want to consider creating a custom contentView.
The List and chart components are examples of doing this. The List extends Container, but it also provides a special contentView called DataGroup, which is designed to work with item renderers. The List then uses the VerticalLayout to present the item renderer instances.
The chart components use ChartDataGroup which is designed to work with the graphic elements of the chart; charts use their own layouts to make each chart type.
To replace a Container's content view:
Tour de Jewel{:target=‘_blank’} has seven examples of layouts, with sample code you can download, study, and adapt to your project. The examples use the Jewel component set, but the layouts would work equally well with any component set.