| type=page |
| title=Compliance Costs and the Apache License |
| notice=https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| ~~~~~~ |
| ##The Apache OpenOffice Compliance Advantages |
| |
| As you probably already know, you don't own software in the same way |
| you own a chair or a desk. Instead, you license the software from |
| the publisher; this gives you permission to use the software, but |
| only under terms specified by the license. |
| |
| In the case of Apache OpenOffice, this license is the |
| [Apache Software License 2.0][1], a free and open source software |
| license. Like other open source licenses, the Apache License explicitly |
| allows you to copy and redistribute the covered product, without any |
| license fees or royalties. |
| |
| The Apache License is a permissive license: companies and individual |
| developers who create derivative products of OpenOffice can do so |
| free of any constraints on the license to apply to the derivative |
| product they release. |
| |
| This makes OpenOffice an excellent choice for users and developers who |
| want to avoid compliance woes and related risks and costs. |
| |
| ##For Users: Reduced Software License Compliance Costs |
| |
| In the case of commercial software, the licensing terms typically say |
| how many users or PC's may access the software. The terms might even |
| include a clause allowing the vendor to audit your usage of the |
| software. |
| |
| In order to avoid the expense and penalties of an audit from the |
| Business Software Alliance (BSA), including those originated by |
| employees turning in their employer for software piracy, organizations |
| are increasingly adopting Software Asset Management (SAM) practices to |
| ensure that their use of commercial software complies with the |
| applicable licenses. These practices generally include employee |
| education along with the purchase of software to track licenses and |
| software use within the organization. |
| |
| The combined cost of these SAM practices is the "cost of compliance" |
| for using commercial proprietary software products. It is an expense |
| that does not make your organization more productive. It is purely risk |
| mitigation. Along with license, maintenance and training costs, it is |
| one of the expenses of using commercial software. |
| |
| Open source software like Apache OpenOffice, instead, comes with a |
| license that explicitly permits free redistribution. This reduces |
| the cost of compliance for many organizations, since tracking |
| application usage is not needed. |
| |
| ##For Developers: Reduced Constraints on Derivative Products |
| |
| The permissive nature of the Apache License means that developers and |
| companies distributing derivative products needn't worry about |
| combining their code with the OpenOffice code and releasing derivative |
| products under their license of choice. |
| |
| The Apache License has no propagative (or "copyleft", or "viral") |
| effects, i.e., it does not influence the license of the derivative |
| product: if you base your product on source code distributed under the |
| Apache License you have no legal obligation of releasing the entire |
| source code tree to the users of the program. All that is required is an |
| attribution of the Apache Licensed source code. |
| |
| The Apache License thus reduces the need for employee education, the |
| frequency of internal audits, the intensity of internal audits. |
| |
| [1]: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |