blob: ed2345977c9cfd918adb89efda5f65e90b5891d5 [file] [log] [blame]
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
* The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
* (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package org.apache.solr.util;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.lucene.util.Constants;
import org.apache.solr.SolrTestCase;
public class TestSSLTestConfig extends SolrTestCase {
/** Sanity check that our JVM version parsing logic seems correct */
public void testIsOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems() {
final List<String> rel_suffixes = Arrays.asList("", "+42");
final List<String> ea_suffixes = Arrays.asList("-ea", "-ea+42");
final List<String> suffixes = Arrays.asList("", "+42", "-ea", "-ea+42");
// as far as we know, any Java 8, 9 or 10 impl should be fine...
for (String base : Arrays.asList("1.8", "1.8.0", "1.8.1",
"9", "9.0", "9.1", "9.0.0", "9.1.0", "9.1.1",
"10", "10.0", "10.1", "10.0.0", "10.1.0", "10.1.1")) {
for (String suffix : suffixes) {
final String v = base + suffix;
assertFalse(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v));
}
}
// Known Problems start with Java 11...
// java 11 releases below 11.0.3 were all bad...
for (String bad : Arrays.asList("11", "11.0", "11.0.1", "11.0.2")) {
for (String suffix : suffixes) {
final String v = bad + suffix;
assertTrue(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v));
}
}
// ...but 11.0.3 or higher should be ok.
for (String ok : Arrays.asList("11.0.3", "11.0.42", "11.1", "11.1.42")) {
for (String suffix : suffixes) {
final String v = ok + suffix;
assertFalse(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v));
}
}
// As far as we know/hope, all "official" java 12 and higher impls should be fine...
for (String major : Arrays.asList("12", "13", "99")) {
for (String minor : Arrays.asList("", ".0", ".42", ".0.42")) {
for (String suffix : rel_suffixes) {
final String v = major + minor + suffix;
assertFalse(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v));
}
}
}
// ...but pre EA "testing" builds of 11, 12, and 13 are all definitely problematic...
for (String major : Arrays.asList("11", "12", "13")) {
for (String suffix : suffixes) {
final String v = major + "-testing" + suffix;
assertTrue(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v));
}
}
// ...and all 13-ea builds (so far) have definitely been problematic.
for (String suffix : ea_suffixes) {
final String v = "13" + suffix;
assertTrue(v, SSLTestConfig.isOpenJdkJvmVersionKnownToHaveProblems(v));
}
}
public void testFailIfUserRunsTestsWithJVMThatHasKnownSSLBugs() {
// NOTE: If there is some future JVM version, where all available "ea" builds are known to be buggy,
// but we still want to be able to use for running tests (ie: via jenkins) to look for *other* bugs,
// then those -ea versions can be "white listed" here...
try {
SSLTestConfig.assumeSslIsSafeToTest();
} catch (org.junit.AssumptionViolatedException ave) {
fail("Current JVM (" + Constants.JVM_NAME + " / " + Constants.JVM_VERSION +
") is known to have SSL Bugs. Other tests that (explicitly or via randomization) " +
" use SSL will be SKIPed");
}
}
}