OpenServerless — Incubator Health (Reports + GitHub + Mailing Lists)

Generated on 2025-10-29

Windows: 3m, 6m, 12m

Trends (short vs medium)

  • Releases (from list votes/results): 0 (—)
  • Median days between releases: — (—)
  • New contributors: 0 (—)
  • Unique committers: 1 (—)
  • Commits: 1 (—)
  • Issues opened/closed: 14/8 (↘↘/↘↘)
  • PRs opened/merged: 2/1 (—/—)
  • Median PR time-to-merge (days): — (—)
  • Bus factor proxy (contributors to reach 50% / 75% of commits): 1 / 1 (→/→)
  • Mailing list msgs (dev@): 176 (↘↘)
  • Unique posters (dev@): 4 (—)
  • Reviewer diversity (eff.#, sampled): 1.0 (—)
  • PR author diversity (eff.#, sampled): 1.0 (—)
  • Unique reviewers (sampled): 1 (—)
  • Unique PR authors (sampled): 1 (—)

Trends (short vs long)

  • Releases (from list votes/results): 0 (—)
  • Median days between releases: — (—)
  • New contributors: 0 (—)
  • Unique committers: 1 (—)
  • Commits: 1 (—)
  • Issues opened/closed: 14/8 (↘↘/↘↘)
  • PRs opened/merged: 2/1 (—/—)
  • Median PR time-to-merge (days): — (—)
  • Bus factor proxy (contributors to reach 50% / 75% of commits): 1 / 1 (→/↘↘)
  • Mailing list msgs (dev@): 176 (↘↘)
  • Unique posters (dev@): 4 (—)
  • Reviewer diversity (eff.#, sampled): 1.0 (—)
  • PR author diversity (eff.#, sampled): 1.0 (—)
  • Unique reviewers (sampled): 1 (—)
  • Unique PR authors (sampled): 1 (—)

Window Details

3m (2025-07-29 → 2025-10-29)

  • Releases (from list votes/results): 0 | Median gap (days): —
  • New contributors: 0 | Unique committers: 1 | Commits: 1
  • Issues: opened 14 / closed 8
  • PRs: opened 2 / merged 1 | Median merge time (days): 0.0
  • Reviews (sampled): median reviewers/PR 1 | reviewer diversity (eff.#) 1.0 | PR author diversity (eff.#) 1.0 | unique reviewers 1, unique authors 1
  • Bus factor proxy (50% / 75%): 1 / 1
  • Incubator reports: 1 | Avg mentor sign-offs: 2.0
  • Mailing lists: dev messages 176, dev unique posters 4

6m (2025-04-29 → 2025-10-29)

  • Releases (from list votes/results): 0 | Median gap (days): —
  • New contributors: 0 | Unique committers: 2 | Commits: 6
  • Issues: opened 53 / closed 37
  • PRs: opened 9 / merged 6 | Median merge time (days): 1.1
  • Reviews (sampled): median reviewers/PR 1.0 | reviewer diversity (eff.#) 1.81 | PR author diversity (eff.#) 1.38 | unique reviewers 3, unique authors 2
  • Bus factor proxy (50% / 75%): 1 / 1
  • Incubator reports: 2 | Avg mentor sign-offs: 2.0
  • Mailing lists: dev messages 546, dev unique posters 6

12m (2024-10-29 → 2025-10-29)

  • Releases (from list votes/results): 0 | Median gap (days): —
  • New contributors: 0 | Unique committers: 3 | Commits: 13
  • Issues: opened 91 / closed 70
  • PRs: opened 16 / merged 13 | Median merge time (days): 0.0
  • Reviews (sampled): median reviewers/PR 1 | reviewer diversity (eff.#) 1.81 | PR author diversity (eff.#) 2.09 | unique reviewers 3, unique authors 3
  • Bus factor proxy (50% / 75%): 1 / 2
  • Incubator reports: 4 | Avg mentor sign-offs: 2.0
  • Mailing lists: dev messages 1000, dev unique posters 9

Reading the Indicators

  • Use trend arrows to compare available windows; when a window lacks ≥28 days or ≥5 events, trends show —.
  • Look for balance: steady releases, active community discussions, and a mix of reviewers signal healthier progress.
  • Check anomalies: sudden drop-offs or spikes may need mentor follow-up.
  • Consider proportionality: absolute numbers matter less than whether activity is sustainable for the project’s size.
  • Watch diversity trends: concentration in one person or company is a risk, even if raw activity looks strong.
  • Look beyond developers: list traffic and wider participation matter as much as GitHub stats.
  • Treat results as conversation starters: these outputs inform mentoring; they aren’t pass/fail scores.

Trend Arrows Legend

  • → = change within ±10% (flat)
  • ↗ / ↘ = 10–25% increase / decrease (small)
  • ↗↗ / ↘↘ = 25–100% increase / decrease (medium)
  • ↗↗↗ / ↘↘↘ = ≥100% increase / decrease (large)