| --- |
| title: "DORA - Change Failure Rate" |
| description: > |
| DORA - Change Failure Rate |
| sidebar_position: 29 |
| --- |
| |
| ## What is this metric? |
| The percentage of changes that were made to a code that then resulted in incidents, rollbacks, or any type of production failure. |
| |
| ## Why is it important? |
| Unlike Deployment Frequency and Lead Time for Changes that measure the throughput, Change Failure Rate measures the stability and quality of software delivery. A low CFR reflects a bad end-user experience as the production failure is relatively high. |
| |
| ## Which dashboard(s) does it exist in |
| DORA dashboard. See [live demo](https://grafana-lake.demo.devlake.io/grafana/d/qNo8_0M4z/dora?orgId=1). |
| |
| |
| ## How is it calculated? |
| The number of failures per the number of deployments. For example, if there are five deployments in a day and one causes a failure, that is a 20% change failure rate. |
| |
| Below are the benchmarks for different development teams from Google's report. However, it's difficult to tell which group a team falls into when the team's change failure rate is `18%` or `40%`. Therefore, DevLake provides its own benchmarks to address this problem: |
| |
| | Groups | Benchmarks | DevLake Benchmarks | |
| | -----------------| ----------------| -------------------| |
| | Elite performers | 0%-15% | 0%-15% | |
| | High performers | 16%-30% | 16-20% | |
| | Medium performers| 16%-30% | 21%-30% | |
| | Low performers | 16%-30% | > 30% | |
| |
| <p><i>Source: 2021 Accelerate State of DevOps, Google</i></p> |
| |
| <b>Data Sources Required</b> |
| |
| This metric relies on: |
| - `Deployments` collected in one of the following ways: |
| - Open APIs of Jenkins, GitLab, GitHub, etc. |
| - Webhook for general CI tools. |
| - Releases and PR/MRs from GitHub, GitLab APIs, etc. |
| - `Incidents` collected in one of the following ways: |
| - Issue tracking tools such as Jira, TAPD, GitHub, etc. |
| - Bug or Service Monitoring tools such as PagerDuty, Sentry, etc. |
| - CI pipelines that marked the 'failed' deployments. |
| |
| <b>Transformation Rules Required</b> |
| |
| This metric relies on: |
| - Deployment configuration in Jenkins, GitLab or GitHub transformation rules to let DevLake know what CI builds/jobs can be regarded as `Deployments`. |
| - Incident configuration in Jira, GitHub or TAPD transformation rules to let DevLake know what CI builds/jobs can be regarded as `Incidents`. |
| |
| <b>SQL Queries</b> |
| |
| If you want to measure the monthly trend of change failure rate as the picture shown below, run the following SQL in Grafana. |
| |
|  |
| |
| ``` |
| with _deployments as ( |
| -- get the deployment count each month |
| SELECT |
| date_format(finished_date,'%y/%m') as month, |
| COUNT(distinct id) AS deployment_count |
| FROM |
| cicd_tasks |
| WHERE |
| type = 'DEPLOYMENT' |
| and result = 'SUCCESS' |
| GROUP BY 1 |
| ), |
| |
| _incidents as ( |
| -- get the incident count each month |
| SELECT |
| date_format(created_date,'%y/%m') as month, |
| COUNT(distinct id) AS incident_count |
| FROM |
| issues |
| WHERE |
| type = 'INCIDENT' |
| GROUP BY 1 |
| ), |
| |
| _calendar_months as( |
| -- deal with the month with no incidents |
| SELECT date_format(CAST((SYSDATE()-INTERVAL (month_index) MONTH) AS date), '%y/%m') as month |
| FROM ( SELECT 0 month_index |
| UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 2 UNION ALL SELECT 3 |
| UNION ALL SELECT 4 UNION ALL SELECT 5 UNION ALL SELECT 6 |
| UNION ALL SELECT 7 UNION ALL SELECT 8 UNION ALL SELECT 9 |
| UNION ALL SELECT 10 UNION ALL SELECT 11 |
| ) month_index |
| WHERE (SYSDATE()-INTERVAL (month_index) MONTH) > SYSDATE()-INTERVAL 6 MONTH |
| ) |
| |
| SELECT |
| cm.month, |
| case |
| when d.deployment_count is null or i.incident_count is null then 0 |
| else i.incident_count/d.deployment_count end as change_failure_rate |
| FROM |
| _calendar_months cm |
| left join _incidents i on cm.month = i.month |
| left join _deployments d on cm.month = d.month |
| ORDER BY 1 |
| ``` |
| |
| If you want to measure in which category your team falls into as the picture shown below, run the following SQL in Grafana. |
| |
|  |
| |
| ``` |
| with _deployment_count as ( |
| -- get the deployment deployed within the selected time period in the top-right corner |
| SELECT |
| COUNT(distinct id) AS deployment_count |
| FROM |
| cicd_tasks |
| WHERE |
| type = 'DEPLOYMENT' |
| and result = 'SUCCESS' |
| and $__timeFilter(finished_date) |
| ), |
| |
| _incident_count as ( |
| -- get the incident created within the selected time period in the top-right corner |
| SELECT |
| COUNT(distinct id) AS incident_count |
| FROM |
| issues |
| WHERE |
| type = 'INCIDENT' |
| and $__timeFilter(created_date) |
| ) |
| |
| SELECT |
| case |
| when deployment_count is null or incident_count is null or deployment_count = 0 then NULL |
| when incident_count/deployment_count <= .15 then "0-15%" |
| when incident_count/deployment_count <= .20 then "16%-20%" |
| when incident_count/deployment_count <= .30 then "21%-30%" |
| else "> 30%" |
| end as change_failure_rate |
| FROM |
| _deployment_count, _incident_count |
| ``` |
| |
| ## How to improve? |
| - Add unit tests for all new feature |
| - "Shift left", start QA early and introduce more automated tests |
| - Enforce code review if it's not strictly executed |