perfect hash join (#19411)

## Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes #123` indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
-->

- Closes #17635.

## Rationale for this change

This PR introduces a Perfect Hash Join optimization by using an
array-based direct mapping(`ArrayMap`) instead of a HashMap.
The array-based approach outperforms the standard Hash Join when the
build-side keys are **_dense_** (i.e., the ratio of `count / (max -
min+1)` is high) or when the key range `(max - min)` is sufficiently
**small**.

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->

The following results from the hj.rs benchmark suite. The benchmark was
executed with the optimization enabled by setting
`DATAFUSION_EXECUTION_PERFECT_HASH_JOIN_MIN_KEY_DENSITY=0.1`
```

┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ Query                                                  ┃   base_hj ┃ density=0.1 ┃        Change ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ QQuery 1_density=1_prob_hit=1_25*1.5M                  │   5.50 ms │     4.54 ms │ +1.21x faster │
│ QQuery 2_density=0.026_prob_hit=1_25*1.5M              │   6.13 ms │     5.43 ms │ +1.13x faster │
│ QQuery 3_density=1_prob_hit=1_100K*60M                 │ 132.59 ms │    97.42 ms │ +1.36x faster │
│ QQuery 4_density=1_prob_hit=0.1_100K*60M               │ 146.66 ms │    97.75 ms │ +1.50x faster │
│ QQuery 5_density=0.75_prob_hit=1_100K*60M              │ 139.85 ms │   103.82 ms │ +1.35x faster │
│ QQuery 6_density=0.75_prob_hit=0.1_100K*60M            │ 256.62 ms │   192.15 ms │ +1.34x faster │
│ QQuery 7_density=0.5_prob_hit=1_100K*60M               │ 136.27 ms │    91.64 ms │ +1.49x faster │
│ QQuery 8_density=0.5_prob_hit=0.1_100K*60M             │ 234.89 ms │   185.35 ms │ +1.27x faster │
│ QQuery 9_density=0.2_prob_hit=1_100K*60M               │ 132.76 ms │    98.44 ms │ +1.35x faster │
│ QQuery 10_density=0.2_prob_hit=0.1_100K*60M            │ 240.04 ms │   184.93 ms │ +1.30x faster │
│ QQuery 11_density=0.1_prob_hit=1_100K*60M              │ 133.02 ms │   108.11 ms │ +1.23x faster │
│ QQuery 12_density=0.1_prob_hit=0.1_100K*60M            │ 235.44 ms │   209.10 ms │ +1.13x faster │
│ QQuery 13_density=0.01_prob_hit=1_100K*60M             │ 135.64 ms │   132.52 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 14_density=0.01_prob_hit=0.1_100K*60M           │ 235.88 ms │   234.62 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 15_density=0.2_prob_hit=0.1_100K_(20%_dups)*60M │ 178.49 ms │   147.55 ms │ +1.21x faster │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┴───────────┴─────────────┴───────────────┘
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ Benchmark Summary          ┃           ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ Total Time (base_hj)       │ 2349.79ms │
│ Total Time (density=0.1)   │ 1893.37ms │
│ Average Time (base_hj)     │  156.65ms │
│ Average Time (density=0.1) │  126.22ms │
│ Queries Faster             │        13 │
│ Queries Slower             │         0 │
│ Queries with No Change     │         2 │
│ Queries with Failure       │         0 │
└────────────────────────────┴───────────┘

```


The following results from tpch-sf10
```
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ Query        ┃       base ┃ perfect_hj ┃        Change ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ QQuery 1     │  739.66 ms │  743.84 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 2     │  315.94 ms │  317.53 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 3     │  655.79 ms │  669.24 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 4     │  215.48 ms │  218.79 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 5     │ 1131.42 ms │ 1146.03 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 6     │  202.32 ms │  190.83 ms │ +1.06x faster │
│ QQuery 7     │ 1734.06 ms │ 1710.50 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 8     │ 1185.05 ms │ 1173.90 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 9     │ 2036.76 ms │ 1994.30 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 10    │  907.32 ms │  893.20 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 11    │  306.63 ms │  275.46 ms │ +1.11x faster │
│ QQuery 12    │  404.00 ms │  381.95 ms │ +1.06x faster │
│ QQuery 13    │  531.67 ms │  498.58 ms │ +1.07x faster │
│ QQuery 14    │  317.63 ms │  303.04 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 15    │  602.24 ms │  572.18 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 16    │  200.00 ms │  201.68 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 17    │ 1848.67 ms │ 1790.60 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 18    │ 2130.63 ms │ 2179.84 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 19    │  501.81 ms │  529.85 ms │  1.06x slower │
│ QQuery 20    │  637.91 ms │  661.72 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 21    │ 1882.43 ms │ 1917.10 ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 22    │  130.68 ms │  141.76 ms │  1.08x slower │
└──────────────┴────────────┴────────────┴───────────────┘
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ Benchmark Summary         ┃            ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ Total Time (base)         │ 18618.10ms │
│ Total Time (perfect_hj)   │ 18511.93ms │
│ Average Time (base)       │   846.28ms │
│ Average Time (perfect_hj) │   841.45ms │
│ Queries Faster            │          4 │
│ Queries Slower            │          2 │
│ Queries with No Change    │         16 │
│ Queries with Failure      │          0 │
└───────────────────────────┴────────────┘
```

## What changes are included in this PR?

- During the `collect_left_input` (build) phase, we now conditionally
use an `ArrayMap` instead of a standard `JoinHashMapType`. This
optimization is triggered only when the following conditions are met:
  - There is exactly one join key.
- The join key can be any integer type convertible to u64 (excluding
i128 and u128).
- The key distribution is sufficiently dense or the key range (max -
min) is small enough to justify an array-based allocation.
  - build_side.num_rows() < `u32::MAX`
- The `ArrayMap` works by storing the minimum key as an offset and using
a Vec to directly map a key `k` to its build-side index via `data[k-
offset]`.
- Rewrite Hash Join micro-benchmarks in benchmarks/src/hj.rs to evaluate
ArrayMap and
  HashMap performance across varying key densities and probe hit rates



<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->

## Are these changes tested?
Yes
<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->

## Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes, this PR introduces two new session configuration parameters to
control the behavior of the Perfect Hash Join optimization:

- `perfect_hash_join_small_build_threshold`: This parameter defines the
maximum key range (max_key - min_key) for the build side to be
considered "small." If the key range is below this threshold, the
array-based join will be triggered regardless of key density.
- `perfect_hash_join_min_key_density`: This parameter sets the minimum
density (row_count / key_range) required to enable the perfect hash join
optimization for larger key ranges
<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.
-->

<!--
If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api
change` label.
-->