blob: 0b37c18dab83b9dbd508dc0ace802e860364bd25 [file] [log] [blame]
.. Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
.. or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
.. distributed with this work for additional information
.. regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
.. to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
.. "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
.. with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
..
.. http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
..
.. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
.. distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
.. WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
.. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
.. limitations under the License.
.. highlight:: none
Bloom Filters
-------------
In the read path, Cassandra merges data on disk (in SSTables) with data in RAM (in memtables). To avoid checking every
SSTable data file for the partition being requested, Cassandra employs a data structure known as a bloom filter.
Bloom filters are a probabilistic data structure that allows Cassandra to determine one of two possible states: - The
data definitely does not exist in the given file, or - The data probably exists in the given file.
While bloom filters can not guarantee that the data exists in a given SSTable, bloom filters can be made more accurate
by allowing them to consume more RAM. Operators have the opportunity to tune this behavior per table by adjusting the
the ``bloom_filter_fp_chance`` to a float between 0 and 1.
The default value for ``bloom_filter_fp_chance`` is 0.1 for tables using LeveledCompactionStrategy and 0.01 for all
other cases.
Bloom filters are stored in RAM, but are stored offheap, so operators should not consider bloom filters when selecting
the maximum heap size. As accuracy improves (as the ``bloom_filter_fp_chance`` gets closer to 0), memory usage
increases non-linearly - the bloom filter for ``bloom_filter_fp_chance = 0.01`` will require about three times as much
memory as the same table with ``bloom_filter_fp_chance = 0.1``.
Typical values for ``bloom_filter_fp_chance`` are usually between 0.01 (1%) to 0.1 (10%) false-positive chance, where
Cassandra may scan an SSTable for a row, only to find that it does not exist on the disk. The parameter should be tuned
by use case:
- Users with more RAM and slower disks may benefit from setting the ``bloom_filter_fp_chance`` to a numerically lower
number (such as 0.01) to avoid excess IO operations
- Users with less RAM, more dense nodes, or very fast disks may tolerate a higher ``bloom_filter_fp_chance`` in order to
save RAM at the expense of excess IO operations
- In workloads that rarely read, or that only perform reads by scanning the entire data set (such as analytics
workloads), setting the ``bloom_filter_fp_chance`` to a much higher number is acceptable.
Changing
^^^^^^^^
The bloom filter false positive chance is visible in the ``DESCRIBE TABLE`` output as the field
``bloom_filter_fp_chance``. Operators can change the value with an ``ALTER TABLE`` statement:
::
ALTER TABLE keyspace.table WITH bloom_filter_fp_chance=0.01
Operators should be aware, however, that this change is not immediate: the bloom filter is calculated when the file is
written, and persisted on disk as the Filter component of the SSTable. Upon issuing an ``ALTER TABLE`` statement, new
files on disk will be written with the new ``bloom_filter_fp_chance``, but existing sstables will not be modified until
they are compacted - if an operator needs a change to ``bloom_filter_fp_chance`` to take effect, they can trigger an
SSTable rewrite using ``nodetool scrub`` or ``nodetool upgradesstables -a``, both of which will rebuild the sstables on
disk, regenerating the bloom filters in the progress.