blob: 3b39560b715678bdfdaa4e5bb097a1364bc104c9 [file] [log] [blame]
~~ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
~~ contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
~~ this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
~~ The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
~~ (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
~~ the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
~~
~~ https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
~~
~~ Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
~~ distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
~~ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
~~ See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
~~ limitations under the License.
---
Trevni: A Column File Format
---
Trevni: A Column File Format
Version 0.1
DRAFT
This document is the authoritative specification of a file format.
Its intent is to permit compatible, independent implementations that
read and/or write files in this format.
Introduction
Data sets are often described as a <table> composed of <rows> and
<columns>. Each record in the dataset is considered a row, with
each field of the record occupying a different column. Writing
records to a file one-by-one as they are created results in a
<row-major> format, like Hadoops SequenceFile or Avro data files.
In many cases higher query performance may be achieved if the data
is instead organized in a <column-major> format, where multiple
values of a given column are stored adjacently. This document
defines such a column-major file format for datasets.
To permit scalable, distributed query evaluation, datasets are
partitioned into row groups, containing distinct collections of
rows. Each row group is organized in column-major order, while row
groups form a row-major partitioning of the entire dataset.
Rationale
* Goals
The format is meant satisfy the following goals:
[[1]] Maximize the size of row groups. Disc drives are used most
efficiently when sequentially accessing data. Consider a drive that
takes 10ms to seek and transfers at 100MB/second. If a 10-column
dataset whose values are all the same size is split into 10MB row
groups, then accessing a single column will require a sequence of
seek+1MB reads, for a cost of 20ms/MB processed. If the same
dataset is split into 100MB row groups then this drops to 11ms/MB
processed. This effect is exaggerated for datasets with larger
numbers of columns and with columns whose values are smaller than
average. So wed prefer row groups that are 100MB or greater.
[[1]] Permit random access within a row group. Some queries will
first examine one column, and, only when certain relatively rare
criteria are met, examine other columns. Rather than iterating
through selected columns of the row-group in parallel, one might
iterate through one column and randomly access another. This is
called support for WHERE clauses, after the SQL operator of that
name.
[[1]] Minimize the number of files per dataset. HDFS is a primary
intended deployment platform for these files. The HDFS Namenode
requires memory for each file in the filesystem, thus for a format
to be HDFS-friendly it should strive to require the minimum number
of distinct files.
[[1]] Support co-location of columns within row-groups. Row groups
are the unit of parallel operation on a column dataset. For
efficient file i/o, the entirety of a row-group should ideally
reside on the host that is evaluating the query in order to avoid
network latencies and bottlenecks.
[[1]] Data integrity. The format should permit applications to
detect data corruption. Many file systems may prevent corruption,
but files may be moved between filesystems and be subject to
corruption at points in that process. It is best if the data in a
file can be validated independently.
[[1]] Extensibility. The format should permit applications to store
additional annotations about a datasets in the files, such as type
information, origin, etc. Some environments may have metadata
stores for such information, but not all do, and files might be
moved among systems with different metadata systems. The ability to
keep such information within the file simplifies the coordination of
such information.
[[1]] Minimal overhead. The column format should not make datasets
appreciably larger. Storage is a primary cost and a choice to use
this format should not require additional storage.
[[1]] Primary format. The column format should be usable as a
primary format for datasets, not as an auxiliary, accelerated
format. Applications that process a dataset in row-major order
should be able to easily consume column files and applications that
produce datasets in row-major order should be able to easily
generate column files.
* Design
To meet these goals we propose the following design.
[[1]] Each row group is a separate file. All values of a column in
a file are written contiguously. This maximizes the row group size,
optimizing performance when querying few and small columns.
[[1]] Each file occupies a single HDFS block. A larger than normal
block size may be specified, e.g., ~1GB instead of the typical
~100MB. This guarantees co-location and eliminates network use when
query processing can be co-located with the file. This also
moderates the memory impact on the HDFS Namenode since no small
files are written.
[[1]] Each column in a file is written as a sequence of ~64kB
compressed blocks. The sequence is prefixed by a table describing
all of the blocks in the column to permit random access within the
column.
[[1]] Application-specific metadata may be added at the file,
column, and block levels.
[[1]] Checksums are included with each block, providing data integrity.
* Discussion
The use of a single block per file achieves the same effect as the
custom block placement policy described in the {{CIF}} paper,
but while still permitting HDFS rebalancing and not increasing the
number of files in the namespace.
Format Specification
This section formally describes the proposed column file format.
* Data Model
We assume a simple data model, where a record is a set of named
fields, and the value of each field is a sequence of untyped bytes.
A type system may be layered on top of this, as specified in the
Type Mapping section below.
* Primitive Values
We define the following primitive value types:
* Signed 64-bit <<long>> values are written using a variable-length
zig-zag coding, where the high-order bit in each byte determines
whether subsequent bytes are present. For example:
*--------------*------*
decimal value | hex bytes
*--------------*------*
0 | 00
*--------------*------*
-1 | 01
*--------------*------*
1 | 02
*--------------*------*
...
*--------------*------*
-64 | 7f
*--------------*------*
64 | 80 01
*--------------*------*
...
*--------------*------*
* <<bytes>> are encoded as a <long> followed by that many bytes of data.
* a <<string>> is encoded as a <long> followed by that many bytes of
UTF-8 encoded character data.
For example, the three-character string "foo" would be encoded as
the <long> value 3 (encoded as hex 06) followed by the UTF-8
encoding of 'f', 'o', and 'o' (the hex bytes 66 6f 6f): 06 66 6f 6f
* Type Names
The following type names are used to describe column values:
* <<null>>, requires zero bytes. Sometimes used in array columns.
* <<boolean>>, one bit, packed into bytes, little-endian;
* <<int>>, like <long>, but restricted to 32-bit signed values
* <<long>> 64-bit signed values, represented as above
* <<fixed32>> 32-bit values stored as four bytes, little-endian.
* <<fixed64>> 64-bit values stored as eight bytes, little-endian.
* <<float>> 32-bit IEEE floating point value, little-endian
* <<double>> 64-bit IEEE floating point value, little-endian
* <<string>> as above
* <<bytes>> as above, may be used to encapsulate more complex objects
[]
Type names are represented as <strings> (UTF-8 encoded, length-prefixed).
* Metadata
<<Metadata>> consists of:
* A <long> indicating the number of metadata key/value pairs.
* For each pair, a <string> key and <bytes> value.
[]
All metadata properties that start with "trevni." are reserved.
** File Metadata
The following file metadata properties are defined:
* <<trevni.codec>> the name of the default compression codec used to
compress blocks, as a <string>. Implementations are required to
support the "null" codec. Optional. If absent, it is assumed to
be "null". Codecs are described in more detail below.
* <<trevni.checksum>> the name of the checksum algorithm used in this
file, as a <string>. Implementations are required to support the
"crc-32” checksum. Optional. If absent, it is assumed to be
"null". Checksums are described in more detail below.
[]
** Column Metadata
The following column metadata properties are defined:
* <<trevni.codec>> the name of the compression codec used to compress
the blocks of this column, as a <string>. Implementations are
required to support the "null" codec. Optional. If absent, it is
assumed to be "null". Codecs are described in more detail below.
* <<trevni.name>> the name of the column, as a <string>. Required.
* <<trevni.type>> the type of data in the column. One of the type names
above. Required.
* <<trevni.values>> if present, indicates that the initial value of each
block in this column will be stored in the block’s descriptor.
Not permitted for array columns or columns that specify a parent.
* <<trevni.array>> if present, indicates that each row in this column
contains a sequence of values of the named type rather than just a
single value. An integer length precedes each sequence of values
indicating the count of values in the sequence. If the length is
negative then it indicates a sequence of zero or one lengths, where -1
indicates two zeros, -2 two ones, -3 three zeros, -4 three ones, etc.
* <<trevni.parent>> if present, the name of an <array> column whose
lengths are also used by this column. Thus values of this column
are sequences but no lengths are stored in this column.
[]
For example, consider the following row, as JSON, where all values
are primitive types, but one has multiple values.
---
{"id"=566, "date"=23423234234
"from"="foo@bar.com",
"to"=["bar@baz.com", "bang@foo.com"],
"content"="Hi!"}
---
The columns for this might be specified as:
---
name=id type=int
name=date type=long
name=from type=string
name=to type=string array=true
name=content type=string
---
If a row contains an array of records, e.g. "received" in the following:
---
{"id"=566, "date"=23423234234
"from"="foo@bar.com",
"to"=["bar@baz.com", "bang@foo.com"],
"content"="Hi!"
"received"=[{"date"=234234234234, "host"="192.168.0.0.1"},
{"date"=234234545645, "host"="192.168.0.0.2"}]
}
---
Then one can define a parent column followed by a column for each
field in the record, adding the following columns:
---
name=received type=null array=true
name=date type=long parent=received
name=host type=string parent=received
---
If an array value itself contains an array, e.g. the "sigs" below:
---
{"id"=566, "date"=23423234234
"from"="foo@bar.com",
"to"=["bar@baz.com", "bang@foo.com"],
"content"="Hi!"
"received"=[{"date"=234234234234, "host"="192.168.0.0.1",
"sigs"=[{"algo"="weak", "value"="0af345de"}]},
{"date"=234234545645, "host"="192.168.0.0.2",
"sigs"=[]}]
}
---
Then a parent column may be defined that itself has a parent column.
---
name=sigs type=null array=true parent=received
name=algo type=string parent=sigs
name=value type=string parent=sigs
---
** Block Metadata
No block metadata properties are currently defined.
* File Format
A <<file>> consists of:
* A <file header>, followed by
* one or more <columns>.
[]
A <<file header>> consists of:
* Four bytes, ASCII 'T', 'r', 'v', followed by 0x02.
* a <fixed64> indicating the number of rows in the file
* a <fixed32> indicating the number of columns in the file
* file <metadata>.
* for each column, its <column metadata>
* for each column, its starting position in the file as a <fixed64>.
[]
A <<column>> consists of:
* A <fixed32> indicating the number of blocks in this column.
* For each block, a <block descriptor>
* One or more <blocks>.
[]
A <<block descriptor>> consists of:
* A <fixed32> indicating the number of rows in the block
* A <fixed32> indicating the size in bytes of the block before the
codec is applied (excluding checksum).
* A <fixed32> indicating the size in bytes of the block after the
codec is applied (excluding checksum).
* If this column’s metadata declares it to include values, the first
value in the column, serialized according to this column's type.
[]
A <<block>> consists of:
* The serialized column values. If a column is an array column then
value sequences are preceded by their length, as an <int>. If a
codec is specified, the values and lengths are compressed by that
codec.
* The checksum, as determined by the file metadata.
[]
* Codecs
[null] The "null" codec simply passes data through uncompressed.
[deflate] The "deflate" codec writes the data block using the
deflate algorithm as specified in RFC 1951.
[snappy] The "snappy" codec uses Google's Snappy compression library.
* Checksum algorithms
[null] The "null" checksum contains zero bytes.
[crc-32] Each "crc-32" checksum contains the four bytes of an ISO
3309 CRC-32 checksum of the uncompressed block data as a fixed32.
* Type Mappings
We define a standard mapping for how types defined in various
serialization systems are represented in a column file. Records
from these systems are <shredded> into columns. When records are
nested, a depth-first recursive walk can assign a separate column
for each primitive value.
** Avro
** Protocol Buffers
** Thrift
Implementation Notes
Some possible techniques for writing column files include:
[[1]] Use a standard ~100MB block, buffer in memory up to the block
size, then flush the file directly to HDFS. A single reduce task
might create multiple output files. The namenode requires memory
proportional to the number of names and blocks*replication. This
would increase the number of names but not blocks, so this should
still be much better than a file per column.
[[1]] Spill each column to a separate local, temporary file then,
when the file is closed, append these files, writing a single file
to HDFS whose block size is set to be that of the entire file. This
would be a bit slower than and may have trouble when the local disk
is full, but it would better use HDFS namespace and further reduce
seeks when processing columns whose values are small.
[[1]] Use a separate mapreduce job to convert row-major files to
column-major. The map output would output a by (row#, column#,
value) tuple, partitioned by row# but sorted by column# then row#.
The reducer could directly write the column file. But the column
file format would need to be changed to write counts, descriptors,
etc. at the end of files rather than at the front.
[]
(1) is the simplest to implement and most implementations should
start with it.
* References
{CIF} {{{https://arxiv.org/pdf/1105.4252.pdf}<Column-Oriented Storage
Techniques for MapReduce>}}, Floratou, Patel, Shekita, & Tata, VLDB
2011.
{DREMEL} {{{https://research.google.com/pubs/archive/36632.pdf}<Dremel:
Interactive Analysis of Web-Scale Datasets>}}, Melnik, Gubarev, Long,
Romer, Shivakumar, & Tolton, VLDB 2010.