<!--
   Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
   contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
   this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
   The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
   (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
   the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at

       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
   limitations under the License.
-->
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us">
  <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../stylesheets/style.css">
  <title>Include Task</title>
</head>
<body>
  <h2><a name="include">Include</a></h2>
  <h3>Description</h3>
  <p>
    Include another build file into the current project.
  </p>

  <p><em>since Apache Ant 1.8.0</em></p>

  <p>
    <b>Note</b> this task heavily relies on the ProjectHelper
    implementation and doesn't really perform any work of its own.  If
    you have configured Ant to use a ProjectHelper other than Ant's
    default, this task may or may not work.
  </p>

  <p>
    On execution it will read another Ant file into the same Project
    rewriting the included target names and depends lists.  This is
    different
    from <a href="http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#xml-entity-include">Entity
    Includes as explained in the Ant FAQ</a> insofar as the target
    names get prefixed by the included project's name or the as
    attribute and do not appear as if the file was contained in the
    including file.
  </p>
  <p>
    The include task may only be used as a top-level task. This means that
    it may not be used in a target.
  </p>
  <p>
There are two further functional aspects that pertain to this task and
that are not possible with entity includes:
<ul>
  <li>target rewriting</li>
  <li>special properties</li>
</ul>
  </p>
<h4>Target rewriting</h4>

<p>Any target in the included file will be renamed
  to <i>prefix.name</i> where <i>name</i> is the original target's
  name and <i>prefix</i> is either the value of the <i>as</i>
  attribute or the <i>name</i> attribute of the <i>project</i> tag of
  the included file.</p>

<p>The depends attribute of all included targets is rewritten so that
  all target names are prefixed as well.  This makes the included file
  self-contained.</p>

<p>Note that prefixes nest, so if a build file includes a file with
  prefix "a" and the included file includes another file with prefix
  "b", then the targets of that last build file will be prefixed by
  "a.b.".</p>

<p><code>&lt;import&gt;</code> contribute to the prefix as well, but
  only if their <code>as</code> attribute has been specified.

<h4>Special Properties</h4>

<p>Included files are treated as they are present in the main
buildfile. This makes it easy to understand, but it makes it impossible
for them to reference files and resources relative to their path.
Because of this, for every included file, Ant adds a property that
contains the path to the included buildfile. With this path, the
included buildfile can keep resources and be able to reference them
relative to its position.</p>

<p>So if I include for example a <i>docsbuild.xml</i> file named <b>builddocs</b>,
I can get its path as <b>ant.file.builddocs</b>, similarly to the <b>ant.file</b>
property of the main buildfile.</p>

<p>Note that &quot;builddocs&quot; is not the filename, but the name attribute
present in the included project tag.</p>
  <p>
    If the included file does not have a name attribute, the ant.file.projectname
    property will not be set.
  </p>

<p>If you need to know whether the current build file's source has
  been a file or an URL you can consult the
  property <b>ant.file.type.<em>projectname</em></b> (using the same
  example as above <b>ant.file.type.builddocs</b>) which either have
  the value "file" or "url".</p>

<h4>Resolving files against the included file</h4>

<p>Suppose your main build file called <code>including.xml</code>
includes a build file <code>included.xml</code>, located anywhere on
the file system, and <code>included.xml</code> reads a set of
properties from <code>included.properties</code>:</p>

<pre>&lt;!-- including.xml --&gt;
&lt;project name="including" basedir="." default="..."&gt;
&nbsp; &lt;include file="${path_to_included}/included.xml"/&gt;
&lt;/project&gt;

&lt;!-- included.xml --&gt;
&lt;project name="included" basedir="." default="..."&gt;
&nbsp; &lt;property file="included.properties"/&gt;
&lt;/project&gt;
</pre>

<p>This snippet however will resolve <code>included.properties</code>
against the basedir of <code>including.xml</code>, because the basedir
of <code>included.xml</code> is ignored by Ant. The right way to use
<code>included.properties</code> is:</p>

<pre>
&lt;!-- included.xml --&gt;
&lt;project name="included" basedir="." default="..."&gt;
&nbsp; &lt;dirname property="included.basedir" file="${ant.file.included}"/&gt;
&nbsp; &lt;property file="${included.basedir}/included.properties"/&gt;
&lt;/project&gt;
</pre>

<p>As explained above <code>${ant.file.included}</code> stores the
path of the build script, that defines the project called
<code>included</code>, (in short it stores the path to
<code>included.xml</code>) and <a
href="dirname.html"><code>&lt;dirname&gt;</code></a> takes its
directory. This technique also allows <code>included.xml</code> to be
used as a standalone file (without being included in other
project).</p>

<p>The above description only works for included files that actually
  are included from files and not from URLs.  For files included from
  URLs using resources relative to the included file requires you to
  use tasks that can work on non-file resources in the first place.
  To create a relative resource you'd use something like:</p>

<pre>
  &lt;loadproperties&gt;
    &lt;url baseUrl="${ant.file.included}"
         relativePath="included.properties"/&gt;
  &lt;/loadproperties&gt;
</pre>

<h3>Parameters</h3>
<table border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0">
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td valign="top"><b>Attribute</b></td>
      <td valign="top"><b>Description</b></td>
      <td align="center" valign="top"><b>Required</b></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td valign="top">
        file
      </td>
      <td valign="top">
        The file to include. If this is a relative file name, the file name will be resolved
        relative to the <i>including</i> file. <b>Note</b>, this is unlike most other
        ant file attributes, where relative files are resolved relative to ${basedir}.
      </td>
      <td valign="top" align="center">Yes or a nested resource collection</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td valign="top">
        optional
      </td>
      <td valign="top">
        If true, do not stop the build if the file does not exist,
        default is false.
      </td>
      <td valign="top" align="center">No</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td valign="top">
        as
      </td>
      <td valign="top">
        Specifies the prefix prepended to the target names.  If
        omitted, the name attribute of the project tag of the
        included file will be used.
      </td>
      <td valign="top" align="center">Yes, if the included file's
        project tag doesn't specify a name attribute.</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td valign="top">
        prefixSeparator
      </td>
      <td valign="top">
        Specifies the separator to be used between the prefix and the
        target name.  Defaults to ".".
      </td>
      <td valign="top" align="center">No</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<h3>Parameters specified as nested elements</h3>

<h4>any <a href="../Types/resources.html">resource</a> or resource
collection</h4>

<p>The specified resources will be included.</p>

<h3>Examples</h3>
<pre>&nbsp; &lt;include file=&quot;../common-targets.xml&quot;/&gt;
</pre>

<p>Includes targets from the common-targets.xml file that is in a parent
directory.</p>

<pre>&nbsp; &lt;include file=&quot;${deploy-platform}.xml&quot;/&gt;
</pre>

<p>Includes the project defined by the property deploy-platform</p>

<pre>
  &lt;include&gt;
    &lt;javaresource name="common/targets.xml"&gt;
      &lt;classpath location="common.jar"/&gt;
    &lt;/javaresource&gt;
  &lt;/include&gt;
</pre>

<p>Includes targets from the targets.xml file that is inside the
  directory common inside the jar file common.jar.</p>

<h3>How is <a href="import.html">&lt;import&gt;</a> different
  from &lt;include&gt;?</h3>

<p>The short version: Use import if you intend to override a target,
  otherwise use include.</p>

<p>When using import the imported targets are available by up to two
  names.  Their "normal" name without any prefix and potentially with
  a prefixed name (the value of the as attribute or the imported
  project's name attribute, if any).</p>

<p>When using include the included targets are only available in the
  prefixed form.</p>

<p>When using import, the imported target's depends attribute
  remains unchanged, i.e. it uses "normal" names and allows you to
  override targets in the dependency list.</p>

<p>When using include, the included targets cannot be overridden and
  their depends attributes are rewritten so that prefixed names are
  used.  This allows writers of the included file to control which
  target is invoked as part of the dependencies.</p>

<p>It is possible to include the same file more than once by using
  different prefixes, it is not possible to import the same file more
  than once.</p>

<h4>Examples</h4>

<p><i>nested.xml</i> shall be:</p>

<pre>
&lt;project&gt;
  &lt;target name="setUp"&gt;
    &lt;property name="prop" value="in nested"/&gt;
  &lt;/target&gt;

  &lt;target name="echo" depends="setUp"&gt;
    &lt;echo&gt;prop has the value ${prop}&lt;/echo&gt;
  &lt;/target&gt;
&lt;/project&gt;
</pre>

<p>When using import like in</p>

<pre>
&lt;project default="test"&gt;
  &lt;target name="setUp"&gt;
    &lt;property name="prop" value="in importing"/&gt;
  &lt;/target&gt;

  &lt;import file="nested.xml" as="nested"/&gt;

  &lt;target name="test" depends="nested.echo"/&gt;
&lt;/project&gt;
</pre>

<p>Running the build file will emit:

<pre>
setUp:

nested.echo:
     [echo] prop has the value in importing

test:

</pre>

<p>When using include like in</p>

<pre>
&lt;project default="test"&gt;
  &lt;target name="setUp"&gt;
    &lt;property name="prop" value="in importing"/&gt;
  &lt;/target&gt;

  &lt;include file="nested.xml" as="nested"/&gt;

  &lt;target name="test" depends="nested.echo"/&gt;
&lt;/project&gt;
</pre>

<p>Running the target build file will emit:

<pre>
nested.setUp:

nested.echo:
     [echo] prop has the value in nested

test:

</pre>

<p>and there won't be any target named "echo" on the including build file.</p>

</body>
</html>